1998
DOI: 10.7863/jum.1998.17.9.557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hill-Sachs lesion in recurrent shoulder dislocation: sonographic detection.

Abstract: In a prospective study 61 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation were evaluated by sonography, radiography, and surgery to determine the value of sonography in the detection of a HillSachs lesion. The group consisted of 57 male and four female patients with an average age of 27 years. Hill-Sachs lesion was found in 54 (88%) shoulders of the 61 surgically treated patients. Using surgical findings as the gold standard, we found sonography to be 96% (52 of 54 cases) sensitive, 100% specific (seven … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification of large Hill-Sachs lesions is important because it may indicate a predisposition for recurrent luxation. Our results, 91 % (71 out of 80 shoulders), are similar to other previous reports, such as 88 % (54 out of 61 shoulders) [3] and 94 % (81 out of 86 shoulders) [5]. The average lesion size, such as depth of 3.08 ± 1.1 mm, range between 2 to 5.2 mm and area of 25.21 ± 20.66 mm 2 , range between 9 to 110 mm 2 , was close to other reports [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Identification of large Hill-Sachs lesions is important because it may indicate a predisposition for recurrent luxation. Our results, 91 % (71 out of 80 shoulders), are similar to other previous reports, such as 88 % (54 out of 61 shoulders) [3] and 94 % (81 out of 86 shoulders) [5]. The average lesion size, such as depth of 3.08 ± 1.1 mm, range between 2 to 5.2 mm and area of 25.21 ± 20.66 mm 2 , range between 9 to 110 mm 2 , was close to other reports [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…Ultrasonography is a safe, cheap, available, comfortable and accurate method for diagnosis of Hill-Sachs lesions [3,5,9]. We present here our experience with ultrasound usage in the diagnosis of Hill-Sachs lesions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It's advantageous as it is readily available, avoids radiation, and allows one to obtain dynamic multi-planar images [38] . Ultrasound scanning has also been shown to have a sensitivity and specificity comparable with CT arthrograms in identifying Hill-Sachs lesions [39] .…”
Section: Ultrasonography and Humeral Bone Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In concordance with fractures of the tuberosity complex of the humerus, it is reported that Hill-Sachs lesions are frequently missed with plain radiography [21], whereas sonographically Hill-Sachs lesions can be detected reliably (sensitivity: 91-96%, specificity: 95-100%, accuracy: 94-97%) [9,22]. Bodner et al [7] showed that common injuries like stress fractures, which are frequently overlooked on first radiographs, can be detected with US.…”
Section: Diagnostic Work-upmentioning
confidence: 91%