Abstract:Intracellular pathogens including bacteria, viruses and protozoa hijack host cell functions to access nutrients and to bypass cellular defenses and immune responses. These strategies have been acquired through selective pressure and allowed pathogens to reach an appropriate cellular niche for their survival and growth. To get new insights on how parasites hijack host cellular functions, we developed a SILAC (Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell culture) quantitative proteomics workflow. Our study foc… Show more
“…The RNA‐binding ability of IFIT2 protein is required for antiviral activity and to promote apoptosis (Reich, ). Further, IFIT2 is also known to modulate the microtubule network implicated in cell reorganization during Anncaliia algerae infection as a host response to clear infection (Panek et al, ). The cytokines CCL5 and IL4 are part of the cascade of events leading to efficient parasite control in Leishmania major (Santiago et al, ) and Listeria (Kaufmann, Emoto, Szalay, Barsig, & Flesch, ) infections, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RNA-binding ability of IFIT2 protein is required for antiviral activity and to promote apoptosis (Reich, 2013). Further, IFIT2 is also known to modulate the microtubule network implicated in cell reorganization during Anncaliia algerae infection as a host response to clear infection (Panek et al, 2014). The cytokines CCL5 and IL4 are part of the cascade of events leading to efficient parasite control in Leishmania major (Santiago et al, 2004) and Listeria (Kaufmann, Emoto, Szalay, Barsig, & Flesch, 1997) Our transcriptome data from P. berghei-infected HepG2 cells (Spz+), when compared to previous study of transcriptional landscape of murine hepatoma (Hepa1-6) cells infected with P. berghei sporozoites (Albuquerque et al, 2009), revealed similarity in the differential expression of several host genes such as AARS, CHAC1, DPP7, GPR137, KIF5C, KLF4, MAF, NR4A2, NRP, PROC, PTPN14, and SLC16A4.…”
Section: Ifng Activates Jak/stat Pathway Leading To Synthesis Of Irf1mentioning
SUMOylation is a reversible post translational modification of proteins that regulates protein stabilization, nucleocytoplasmic transport, and protein-protein interactions. Several viruses and bacteria modulate host SUMOylation machinery for efficient infection. Plasmodium sporozoites are infective forms of malaria parasite that invade mammalian hepatocytes and transforms into exoerythrocytic forms (EEFs). Here, we show that during EEF development, the distribution of SUMOylated proteins in host cell nuclei was significantly reduced and expression of the SUMOylation enzymes was downregulated. Plasmodium EEFs destabilized the host cytoplasmic protein SMAD4 by inhibiting its SUMOylation. SUMO1 overexpression was detrimental to EEF growth, and insufficiency of the only conjugating enzyme Ubc9/E2 promoted EEF growth. The expression of genes involved in suppression of host cell defense pathways during infection was reversed during SUMO1 overexpression, as revealed by transcriptomic analysis. The inhibition of host cell SUMOylation was also observed during Toxoplasma infection. We provide a hitherto unknown mechanism of regulating host gene expression by Apicomplexan parasites through altering host SUMOylation.
“…The RNA‐binding ability of IFIT2 protein is required for antiviral activity and to promote apoptosis (Reich, ). Further, IFIT2 is also known to modulate the microtubule network implicated in cell reorganization during Anncaliia algerae infection as a host response to clear infection (Panek et al, ). The cytokines CCL5 and IL4 are part of the cascade of events leading to efficient parasite control in Leishmania major (Santiago et al, ) and Listeria (Kaufmann, Emoto, Szalay, Barsig, & Flesch, ) infections, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RNA-binding ability of IFIT2 protein is required for antiviral activity and to promote apoptosis (Reich, 2013). Further, IFIT2 is also known to modulate the microtubule network implicated in cell reorganization during Anncaliia algerae infection as a host response to clear infection (Panek et al, 2014). The cytokines CCL5 and IL4 are part of the cascade of events leading to efficient parasite control in Leishmania major (Santiago et al, 2004) and Listeria (Kaufmann, Emoto, Szalay, Barsig, & Flesch, 1997) Our transcriptome data from P. berghei-infected HepG2 cells (Spz+), when compared to previous study of transcriptional landscape of murine hepatoma (Hepa1-6) cells infected with P. berghei sporozoites (Albuquerque et al, 2009), revealed similarity in the differential expression of several host genes such as AARS, CHAC1, DPP7, GPR137, KIF5C, KLF4, MAF, NR4A2, NRP, PROC, PTPN14, and SLC16A4.…”
Section: Ifng Activates Jak/stat Pathway Leading To Synthesis Of Irf1mentioning
SUMOylation is a reversible post translational modification of proteins that regulates protein stabilization, nucleocytoplasmic transport, and protein-protein interactions. Several viruses and bacteria modulate host SUMOylation machinery for efficient infection. Plasmodium sporozoites are infective forms of malaria parasite that invade mammalian hepatocytes and transforms into exoerythrocytic forms (EEFs). Here, we show that during EEF development, the distribution of SUMOylated proteins in host cell nuclei was significantly reduced and expression of the SUMOylation enzymes was downregulated. Plasmodium EEFs destabilized the host cytoplasmic protein SMAD4 by inhibiting its SUMOylation. SUMO1 overexpression was detrimental to EEF growth, and insufficiency of the only conjugating enzyme Ubc9/E2 promoted EEF growth. The expression of genes involved in suppression of host cell defense pathways during infection was reversed during SUMO1 overexpression, as revealed by transcriptomic analysis. The inhibition of host cell SUMOylation was also observed during Toxoplasma infection. We provide a hitherto unknown mechanism of regulating host gene expression by Apicomplexan parasites through altering host SUMOylation.
“…The innate immune response to this microbial colonisation is increased urothelial cell shedding, which may be promoted by mast cells [41]. The shed cells may be colonised or unaffected, but the proportion of parasitised cells in the face of infection would be expected to increase [42]. This sediment, a mixture of white cells, epithelial cells and debris, is likely to collect under the influence of gravity at the bladder base, forming a sampling target that should not be influenced by dilution effects.…”
Introduction and hypothesis Midstream urine (MSU) is key in assessing lower urinary tract syndrome (LUTS), but contingent on some assumptions. The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of contamination and the quality of substrates obtained from four different collections: MSU, catheter specimen urine (CSU), a commercial MSU collecting device (Peezy) and a natural void. Contamination was quantified by differential, uroplakin-positive, urothelial cell counts. Methods This was a single blind, crossover study conducted in two phases. First, we compared the MSU with CSU using urine culture, pyuria counts and differential counting of epithelial cells after immunofluorescence staining for uroplakin III (UP3). Second, we compared the three non-invasive (MSU, Peezy MSU™, natural void) methods using UP3 antibody staining only. Results The natural void was best at collecting bladder urinary sediment, with the majority of epithelial cells present derived from the urinary tract. CSU sampling missed much of the urinary sediment and showed sparse culture results. Finally, the MSU collection methods did not capture much of the bladder sediment. Conclusion We found little evidence for contamination with the four methods. Natural void was the best method for harvesting shed urothelial cells and white blood cells. It provides a richer sample of the inflammatory exudate, including parasitised urothelial cells and the microbial substrate. However, if the midstream sample is believed to be important, the MSU collection device is advantageous.
“…This in turn could occasionally yield genotypes that can jump to new host populations or even to new host species, as suggested for filamentous plant pathogens (Raffaele and Kamoun, 2012). Furthermore, recent study also suggests that A. algerae could use a TE as a lure strategy to escape the host innate immune system (Panek et al, 2014). Therefore, TEs may play an important role not solely in modulating the microsporidian genome architecture but also in the capacity of these parasites to infest multiple hosts and especially to adapt to new hosts.…”
Section: Potential Impacts Of Transposable Elements On Microsporidianmentioning
Fungal species play extremely important roles in ecosystems. Clustered at the base of the fungal kingdom are Microsporidia, a group of obligate intracellular eukaryotes infecting multiple animal lineages. Because of their large host spectrum and their implications in host population regulation, they influence food webs, and accordingly, ecosystem structure and function. Unfortunately, their ecological role is not well understood. Present also as highly resistant spores in the environment, their characterisation requires special attention. Different techniques based on direct isolation and/or molecular approaches can be considered to elucidate their role in the ecosystems, but integrating environmental and genomic data (for example, genome architecture, core genome, transcriptional and translational signals) is crucial to better understand the diversity and adaptive capacities of Microsporidia. Here, we review the current status of Microsporidia in trophic networks; the various genomics tools that could be used to ensure identification and evaluate diversity and abundance of these organisms; and how these tools could be used to explore the microsporidian life cycle in different environments. Our understanding of the evolution of these widespread parasites is currently impaired by limited sampling, and we have no doubt witnessed but a small subset of their diversity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.