2019
DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hijacking of Embryonic Programs by Neural Crest-Derived Neuroblastoma: From Physiological Migration to Metastatic Dissemination

Abstract: In the developing organism, complex molecular programs orchestrate the generation of cells in adequate numbers, drive them to migrate along the correct pathways towards appropriate territories, eliminate superfluous cells, and induce terminal differentiation of survivors into the appropriate cell-types. Despite strict controls constraining developmental processes, malignancies can emerge in still immature organisms. This is the case of neuroblastoma (NB), a highly heterogeneous disease, predominantly affecting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with this, accumulating data indicate that re-expression of genes and/or pathways in the wrong place and at the wrong time offers selective advantages towards acquisition of the metastatic potential. In particular, genes that are normally expressed in anatomical sites other than the site of tumor growth, such as tissue-restricted genes which are normally silent in most tissues [ 4 , 5 ] or genetic programs activated in different developmental/differentiation stages, such as programs of embryonic development [ 6 , 7 ] and human placentation [ 8 ], are reactivated “off-context” in metastatic cells. A universally recognized example is the reactivation of the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) that controls the neural crest, which gives rise to a variety of vertebrate structures, across several aggressive cancer types (reviewed in [ 9 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this, accumulating data indicate that re-expression of genes and/or pathways in the wrong place and at the wrong time offers selective advantages towards acquisition of the metastatic potential. In particular, genes that are normally expressed in anatomical sites other than the site of tumor growth, such as tissue-restricted genes which are normally silent in most tissues [ 4 , 5 ] or genetic programs activated in different developmental/differentiation stages, such as programs of embryonic development [ 6 , 7 ] and human placentation [ 8 ], are reactivated “off-context” in metastatic cells. A universally recognized example is the reactivation of the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) that controls the neural crest, which gives rise to a variety of vertebrate structures, across several aggressive cancer types (reviewed in [ 9 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some ethnic differences in NB, with the disease being more prevalent in those with European ancestry, and African‐American children tending to exhibit higher‐risk disease 7 . NB tumors have also been classified as an embryonic tumor, because evidence suggests that such tumors originate from neural crest cells (NCCs) during fetal development 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, this event also happens during embryonic development of the sympathetic nervous system as neuroepithelial cells detach from the neural crest. Researchers, therefore, propose that in special cases of NB, a natural BM dissemination can originate from an early mutation event during the migration of neural crest cells [ 92 ].…”
Section: Stimulation Of Metastasismentioning
confidence: 99%