The acid–base reactions of NNN-tridentate pyrrolyl
ligands (HL1: 2,5-bis((pyrrolidin-1-yl)methylene)-1H-pyrrole; HL2: 2,5-bis((piperidino)methylene)-1H-pyrrole) with rare-earth metal tris(alkyl)s, Ln(CH2SiMe3)3(THF)2, afforded the
corresponding bis(alkyl) complexes L1Ln(CH2SiMe3)2(THF)
x
(Ln = Sc, x = 0 (1a); Ln = Y, x = 1
(1b); Ln = Lu, x = 1 (1c)), L2Sc(CH2SiMe3)2 (2a), and L2
2Ln2(CH2SiMe3)4 (Ln = Y (2b); Lu (2c)) in moderate to high yields. X-ray diffraction analysis
revealed that the scandium complexes 1a and 2a are THF solvent-free monomers where the ligands coordinate to the
Sc3+ ion in a κ1:κ2 mode,
while the yttrium and lutetium complexes 1b and 1c have the same ligand coordination geometry to that of the
scandium complex but are one-THF solvates; complex 2b, however, is a dimer bridged by two anionic L2 fragments
that coordinate to the two yttrium ions in mixed η5:η5/κ1:κ1 coordination
modes. Upon activation with an organoborate, all these complexes initiated
the controlled polymerization of isoprene. In general, complexes 2a–c, bearing ligand L2, exhibited
higher activity than the analogous complexes 1a–c, attached to the L1 ligand. Complex 2b, in which the L2 ligand adopts the mixed η5/κ1 coordination mode, showed the highest
activity and livingness mode toward the polymerization of isoprene
with high cis-1,4-selectivity (94.1%), and both scandium
complexes 1a and 2a exhibited high 3,4-selectivity
(87%) irrespective of the ligand type; in contrast, the lutetium complexes
initiated the atactic isoprene polymerization. The influences of thell
ligand structural factors, the coordination solvent, and the central
metal ion on the catalytic activity and selectivity are discussed.