2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.134108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly-sensitive fire alarm system based on cellulose paper with low-temperature response and wireless signal conversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, other FAS systems have been gradually designed and developed, such as color-changing molecular sensor [16], phase-changing/shape-changing sensors [17,18] and thermoelectric sensors [19][20][21]. Therefore, a variety of fire sensor materials are designed, fabricated and employed, e.g., carbon nanotube, graphene derivatives, metal oxide, MXene, nanocarbon black, chitosan and other biomass-based materials [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Overall, both above FAS show satisfying fire warning performance, e.g., for most reported works, a desirable flame response time of < 5 s can be obtained, which is superior to existing commercial fire alarm devices, e.g., smoke and infrared detectors with a > 100 s fire response time [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, other FAS systems have been gradually designed and developed, such as color-changing molecular sensor [16], phase-changing/shape-changing sensors [17,18] and thermoelectric sensors [19][20][21]. Therefore, a variety of fire sensor materials are designed, fabricated and employed, e.g., carbon nanotube, graphene derivatives, metal oxide, MXene, nanocarbon black, chitosan and other biomass-based materials [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Overall, both above FAS show satisfying fire warning performance, e.g., for most reported works, a desirable flame response time of < 5 s can be obtained, which is superior to existing commercial fire alarm devices, e.g., smoke and infrared detectors with a > 100 s fire response time [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work of cellulose paper-based fire alarm study, which is modified by phytic acid (PA), GO, and MXene solution in variable concentrations to prepare fire-warning samples of PA@GO, PA@MGO20, and PA@MGO5, response time based on the "light intensity change" is proposed [66]. The schematic test processing is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Response Time Based On "Light Intensity Change"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One flame-retardant cellulose paper loaded with GO and MXene is fabricated to construct an EFWS [66]. The system is amazingly fast in response, with only 2 s of a wait when the paper reached 250 °C due to its rapid and sudden conductivity increase.…”
Section: Remote and Iot-based Warning Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the above issues, novel and complementary fire-warning materials and sensors have been developed over several years. Typically, the temperature-responsive resistance transition of various nano-fillers, e.g., graphene oxide (GO) [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], carbon nanotube (CNT) [15], and MXene [16], has been widely used to construct sensitive fire-warning sensors. Among them, GO-based fire-warning materials with sensitive flame detection and fire early-warning response have attractive considerable research interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, pristine GO networks are electrically insulated due to oxygen-containing functional groups in their structure [17][18][19]. On encountering a flame, the reduction of oxygen groups in the insulating GO network can chang it into an electrically conductive rGO one [20][21][22], thus providing a rapid flame-detection response time (normally less than 10 s [11,14,[23][24][25][26][27]). On the other hand, GO-based fire-warning materials also offer an ideal fire early-warning signal that can be activated below the ignition temperatures of most flammable materials, e.g., 232 s at 200 • C and 35 s at 300 • C for 3 -mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane modified-GO nanocomposite paper [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%