2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6an00430j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly sensitive colorimetric detection of glucose and uric acid in biological fluids using chitosan-modified paper microfluidic devices

Abstract: This paper describes the modification of microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (μPADs) with chitosan to improve the analytical performance of colorimetric measurements associated with enzymatic bioassays. Chitosan is a natural biopolymer extensively used to modify biosensing surfaces due to its capability of providing a suitable microenvironment for the direct electron transfer between an enzyme and a reactive surface. This hypothesis was investigated using glucose and uric acid (UA) colorimetric assays … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
95
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
6
95
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, chitosan has been used to modify the surface of μPADs [85]. The fabricated device has demonstrated lower LOD values, i.e.…”
Section: Sensing Technologies Used In μPadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, chitosan has been used to modify the surface of μPADs [85]. The fabricated device has demonstrated lower LOD values, i.e.…”
Section: Sensing Technologies Used In μPadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, chitosan coating and glutaraldehyde cross‐linking were used to modify the surface of the PAD to covalently immobilize antibodies on it. Moreover, these compounds simultaneously enhance the wet‐strength of the PAD and the stability of immobilized antibodies, because chitosan is readily compatible with paper and imparts improved mechanical strength to the paper However, no significant difference in sensitivity was observed in comparison with the PADs that were not functionalized with chitosan and glutaraldehyde.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [4] replaced TBHBA with N -ethyl- N (3-sulfopropyl)-3-methyl-aniline sodium salt (TOPS) and used TOPS/4-APP in μPAD for glucose detection, which showed a limit of detection (LOD) of 38.1 μM. Gabriel et al [96] used 4-AAP and sodium 3,5-dichloro-2-hydroxy-benzenesulfonate (DHBS) as the chromogenic solution. Chitosan was involved to improve the sensing performance of glucose in tear samples and the detection limit was 0.023 mM.…”
Section: Colorimetric Detection Of Glucosementioning
confidence: 99%