2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.05.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly sensitive biochemical sensor comprising rectangular nanometal arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In numerical operations, because including all modes is impossible, errors are unavoidable. To overcome this problem, similar to the FEM approach adopted in this study, the acceptable maximum error (i.e., power loss) for modal expansions was set to −40 dB [7,13,14]. In other words, when the power loss failed to reach the review standard, the number of modes was increased and simulations were repeated until the power loss satisfied the review standard.…”
Section: Results and Analysis Of The Fbg-oadmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In numerical operations, because including all modes is impossible, errors are unavoidable. To overcome this problem, similar to the FEM approach adopted in this study, the acceptable maximum error (i.e., power loss) for modal expansions was set to −40 dB [7,13,14]. In other words, when the power loss failed to reach the review standard, the number of modes was increased and simulations were repeated until the power loss satisfied the review standard.…”
Section: Results and Analysis Of The Fbg-oadmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this drawback and, thus, improve the accuracy of simulation results, this study employed a PRB to convert continuous radiation modes into discrete radiation modes. In addition, to enable the converted discrete radiation modes to achieve expected power loss, a PML was incorporated into the surround layer, enabling the propagation constant of the discrete radiation modes to be −(α + iβ), where α is the attenuation constant and β is the phase constant [13,14].…”
Section: Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, limited by server memory capacity and calculation speed, numerical simulations involving continuous radiation modes are unlikely to be practical. To solve this problem and reduce the difference between simulation results and actual manufacturing outcomes, the present study adopted a previously proposed innovative technique to integrate PML and PRB into the FEM [ 19 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. PRB converts continuous radiation modes reflected onto the boundaries into discrete guided modes.…”
Section: Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method lowers knowledge of the mathematics and physical concepts related to this field [ 18 ]. This study incorporated a perfectly matched layer (PML), perfectly reflecting boundary (PRB), the object-meshing method (OMM), and boundary meshing method (BMM) into the finite element method (FEM) and eigenmode expansion method (EEM) [ 19 , 20 ]. The simulation results include the 2D and 3D power distribution of guided modes, dispersion relation of guided modes, orthogonality relationship between modes, power loss, SFBG period Λ Bragg scanning pattern, SFBG wavelength λ Bragg scanning pattern, and power propagation of HE 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%