2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly sensitive and label-free electrochemical biosensor based on gold nanostructures for studying the interaction of prostate cancer gene sequence with epirubicin anti-cancer drug

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With higher scan speeds, the currents at the oxidation and reduction peaks both grow. As seen in Figure 2 c, a linear increase in the current as a function of root of scan rate is observed with a high R2 value of 0.99 for both bare and Aptamer modified bare electrode, which suggests diffusion-controlled behavior on the part of the electrode [ 51 , 52 ]. The effective working area of the electrodes was determined using the Randles-Sevcik relationship [ 53 ] as shown in Equation (1): where I p is the peak current (A), n is the number of electrons transferred, A is the effective area of the electrode (cm 2) , D is the diffusion coefficient of [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3− considered to be 6.70 × 10 −6 cm 2 , C is the concentration (5 mM) and V is the scan rate (Vs −1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With higher scan speeds, the currents at the oxidation and reduction peaks both grow. As seen in Figure 2 c, a linear increase in the current as a function of root of scan rate is observed with a high R2 value of 0.99 for both bare and Aptamer modified bare electrode, which suggests diffusion-controlled behavior on the part of the electrode [ 51 , 52 ]. The effective working area of the electrodes was determined using the Randles-Sevcik relationship [ 53 ] as shown in Equation (1): where I p is the peak current (A), n is the number of electrons transferred, A is the effective area of the electrode (cm 2) , D is the diffusion coefficient of [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3− considered to be 6.70 × 10 −6 cm 2 , C is the concentration (5 mM) and V is the scan rate (Vs −1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, they are a perfect choice as transducers for biosensors. In this sense, we can find several works using spherical or other shape gold nanoparticle for DNA biosensors [ 7 , [18] , [19] , [20] ] but as far as we know there have not been reported the use of mixtures of gold nanomaterials (AuNMs) of different shapes (gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and gold nanotriangles (AuNTs)) as platforms for DNA biosensor development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to AuNPs, gold nanocubes (AuNC) tend to increase biosensor stability. In addition, the edges and vertices of AuNC provide higher surface energy, so there are more reaction sites available, resulting in more reactive facets [ 15 , 16 ]. Furthermore, Bollalla et al [ 17 ] have also observed that the shape of the gold nanomaterials has a crucial effect on the biocatalytic current related to the oxidation of fructose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%