2021
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c04683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Selective Hydrogenation of C═C Bonds Catalyzed by a Rhodium Hydride

Abstract: Under mild conditions (room temperature, 80 psi of H2) Cp*Rh­(2-(2-pyridyl)­phenyl)H catalyzes the selective hydrogenation of the CC bond in α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds, including natural product precursors with bulky substituents in the β position and substrates possessing an array of additional functional groups. It also catalyzes the hydrogenation of many isolated double bonds. Mechanistic studies reveal that no radical intermediates are involved, and the catalyst appears to be homogeneous, thereby … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This change in mechanism explains the lower observed selectivity and tendency for over-hydrogenation when using non-alcohol solvents in the hydrogenation of 1 and related substrates. Norton and co-workers recently suggested a similar mechanism for hydrogenations occurring in MeOH using Cp*Rh(PhPy)H. [4] Here, labeling studies showed only partial D-incorporation when using D2 or d4-MeOD (~80%), which indicates multiple mechanistic pathways for reduction and could explain the relatively poor performance in the hydrogenation of 1. At this stage Rh-B can either oxidatively add H2 to form the Rh(III)-dihydrido complex Rh-C with a calculated reaction energy of DE = -24.9 kJ/mol, or it can coordinate methanol to form complex Rh-D with DE = -30.9 kJ/mol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This change in mechanism explains the lower observed selectivity and tendency for over-hydrogenation when using non-alcohol solvents in the hydrogenation of 1 and related substrates. Norton and co-workers recently suggested a similar mechanism for hydrogenations occurring in MeOH using Cp*Rh(PhPy)H. [4] Here, labeling studies showed only partial D-incorporation when using D2 or d4-MeOD (~80%), which indicates multiple mechanistic pathways for reduction and could explain the relatively poor performance in the hydrogenation of 1. At this stage Rh-B can either oxidatively add H2 to form the Rh(III)-dihydrido complex Rh-C with a calculated reaction energy of DE = -24.9 kJ/mol, or it can coordinate methanol to form complex Rh-D with DE = -30.9 kJ/mol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…At lower catalyst loadings (0.02 mol% [Rh]), xantphos was far superior, giving 94% yield at full conversion vs 21% yield at 58% conversion with P(OPh)3 (Fig 2C , inset). Cp*Rh(PhPy)H has been recently reported to be an effective catalyst for the hydrogenation of enones; [4] however its use for the reduction of pseudoionone led to poor conversion with multiple products generated (34% conv., 17% yield). The optimized conditions allow for high yield because undesirable hydrogenation of the remaining alkenes in geranylacetone (2) is avoided.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transition-metal catalyzed reduction using H 2 gas as a reductant is simpler and more user-friendly. 19–25 However, the need for a specialized reactor to handle hazardous pressurized hydrogen gas is unavoidable Scheme 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transition-metal catalyzed reduction using H 2 gas as a reductant is simpler and more user-friendly. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] However, the need for a specialized reactor to handle hazardous pressurized hydrogen gas is unavoidable Scheme 1. Alternatively, transition-metal catalyzed transfer hydrogenation in the presence of cheaper and greener hydrogen donors has proven to be the most successful and safe strategy over traditional dissolving metal reductions or direct hydrogenation using molecular hydrogen under high pressure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%