2019
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2019.1598504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly recyclable cysteamine-modified acid-resistant MOFs for enhancing Hg (II) removal from water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The satellite peak at 713.87 eV was attributed to Fe 2+ –O bonds. , From the O 1s spectrum shown in Figure c, the peak at 532.02 eV was attributed to Zr–O bonds from Zr 4+ with −COOH in both UiO-66-(COOH) 2 and Fe 2+ @UiO-66-(COOH) 2 . The peak at 534.01 eV in pristine UiO-66-(COOH) 2 was ascribed to the O atoms of the uncoordinated carboxyl groups . After Fe 2+ incorporation, the binding energy peak of O 1s of in Fe 2+ @UiO-66-(COOH) 2 is partly shifted toward a higher binding energy (533.71 eV), and such big shifts (0.30 eV) indicate the decrease of the electron cloud density of the O atom in the −COOH groups, suggesting the strong coordination between the Fe 2+ and −COOH groups (Figure c) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The satellite peak at 713.87 eV was attributed to Fe 2+ –O bonds. , From the O 1s spectrum shown in Figure c, the peak at 532.02 eV was attributed to Zr–O bonds from Zr 4+ with −COOH in both UiO-66-(COOH) 2 and Fe 2+ @UiO-66-(COOH) 2 . The peak at 534.01 eV in pristine UiO-66-(COOH) 2 was ascribed to the O atoms of the uncoordinated carboxyl groups . After Fe 2+ incorporation, the binding energy peak of O 1s of in Fe 2+ @UiO-66-(COOH) 2 is partly shifted toward a higher binding energy (533.71 eV), and such big shifts (0.30 eV) indicate the decrease of the electron cloud density of the O atom in the −COOH groups, suggesting the strong coordination between the Fe 2+ and −COOH groups (Figure c) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of the thiol‐functionalized MOFs (MIL‐101‐SH and UiO‐66‐SH) in water was determined using inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP–OES). The results showed that Zr‐ and Cr‐based MOFs retained excellent chemical stability after thiol‐functionalization when compared to a Cu‐based MOF (HKUST‐1) (Liu et al., 2019). MIL‐53(Al)‐TDC (2,5‐thiophenedicarboxylate) shows adequate water stability, high thermal and solvent/pH stability, and hydrothermal stability (Tannert et al., 2018).…”
Section: Metal–organic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Liu et al obtained sulfhydryl functionalized metal–organic framework (MIL-101-SH and UiO-66-SH) materials through the condensation reaction of cysteamine with the carboxyl group in the UiO-66-COOH framework. 25 Fu et al prepared a new type of UiO-66-DMTD adsorbent through the post-functionalization reaction of UiO-66-NH 2 and 2,5-dimercapto-1,3,4-thiadiazole. 26…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%