2015
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201500514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Polymer‐Repellent yet Atomically Flat Surfaces Based on Organic Monolayers with a Single Fluorine Atom

Abstract: Organic monolayers or polymer brushes, often in combination with surface structuring, are widely used to prevent nonspecific adsorption of polymeric or biological material on sensor and microfluidic surfaces. Here it is demonstrated for the first time how robust, covalently attached alkyne‐derived monolayers with a varying numbers of fluorine atoms, on atomically flat Si(111), effectively repel a wide range of apolar polymers without the need for micro‐ or nanostructuring of the surface. The antifouling proper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This surface coverage by fouling polymers was quantified by an AFM-based method (blueyellow images in Figure 2). 11 The surface coverage of the polymer brushes by fouling polymers decreases with increased polymer brush thickness. The numerical value of the obtained surface coverage is, of course, dependent on the arbitrarily chosen threshold value, but the point is that the order of the extent of fouling for the different surfaces does not change with the threshold value ( Figure S1A and B), i.e., the trends in the antifouling characteristics (effects of thickness, composition, Langmuir XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX etc.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This surface coverage by fouling polymers was quantified by an AFM-based method (blueyellow images in Figure 2). 11 The surface coverage of the polymer brushes by fouling polymers decreases with increased polymer brush thickness. The numerical value of the obtained surface coverage is, of course, dependent on the arbitrarily chosen threshold value, but the point is that the order of the extent of fouling for the different surfaces does not change with the threshold value ( Figure S1A and B), i.e., the trends in the antifouling characteristics (effects of thickness, composition, Langmuir XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX etc.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Recently, we reported the rst systematic study of the fouling of high-quality uorinated monolayers onto ultraat Si surfaces by a wide range of polymers with variable molecular weights. 13 This choice was based on the high degree of control that is available in the construction of such monolayers, whereas ultraat substrates rigorously decouple the contributions of the molecular structure and surface roughness. In addition, the choice of Si was practically driven by the fact that small-scale orices used in industry are increasingly lithographically prepared from Si.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polymer fouling was studied by XPS, CA and a previously developed bimodal atomic force microscopy (AFM) based approach. 13 For each surface, the fouling experiments were conducted on three different samples, and on each sample the ellipsometry, XPS and AFM measurements were carried out at at least three different places. Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 67 Fouling is generally defined as the deposition or accumulation of unwanted materials on a solid surface, causing severe damage of equipment, 68 and is particularly relevant for reduced flow, such as in orifices in next-generation Si-based printer heads and SiN-based microsieves (typically pore size: 400–4000 nm). Both monolayers 51 and polymer brushes 69 have been used to minimize such organic polymer fouling, but all previously made coatings took many hours and (for the brushes) multistep surface-bound conversions. Therefore, the antifouling properties of the prepared monolayers were studied toward a selection of commonly used polymers with similar molecular weight ( M n ∼ 5000 g/mol), namely poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), poly(vinyl acetate) (PVA), polystyrene (PS), poly(2-vinylpyridine) (P2VP) and poly( N -isopropylacrylamide (PNIPAM).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%