2021
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.103.022802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly polar molecules consisting of a copper or silver atom interacting with an alkali-metal or alkaline-earth-metal atom

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The atomic polarizabilities and ionization potentials of the alkali-metal and alkaline-earth-metal atoms obtained with the used theoretical methods are also in good agreement with experimental data as confirmed in Ref. [75].…”
Section: Convergence and Accuracy Analysissupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The atomic polarizabilities and ionization potentials of the alkali-metal and alkaline-earth-metal atoms obtained with the used theoretical methods are also in good agreement with experimental data as confirmed in Ref. [75].…”
Section: Convergence and Accuracy Analysissupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The electronegativity by the Pauling scale of the Zn (1.65) and Cd (1.69) atoms is almost twice larger than that of the alkali-metal (0.79-0.98) and alkaline-earth-metal (0.89-1.57) atoms [74]. For such large differences, significant permanent EDMs, larger than for analogous alkali-metal-alkaline-earthmetal and alkaline-earth-metal molecules [69][70][71], could be expected (similarly as recently reported for the molecules containing Cu and Ag atoms [75]). Unfortunately, the present values are significantly smaller, partially as a result of weak interatomic interactions and van der Waals nature of the studied molecules, and partially because around minima the permanent EDMs cross zero and change the sign.…”
Section: A Potential Energy Curvessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…There is also a noticeable difference in the harmonic constant ω e for the 1(0 + ) potential, i.e. hc × 85.5 cm −1 for our relativistic potential versus hc × 84.2 cm −1 from reference [31].…”
Section: Electronic Potentials and Transition Dipole Momentsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Spectroscopic constants for these potentials can be found in table 1, while a graph with additional excited electronic potentials can be found in appendix A. The dissociation energy of our 1(0 + ) potential is only 0.5 % smaller than that of reference [31]. The corresponding fractional difference for the shallow 1(0 − ) potential is about 10 %.…”
Section: Electronic Potentials and Transition Dipole Momentsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation