2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.06.128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly parallel demagnetization field calculation using the fast multipole method on tetrahedral meshes with continuous sources

Abstract: The long-range magnetic field is the most time-consuming part in micromagnetic simulations. Improvements both on a numerical and computational basis can relief problems related to this bottleneck. This work presents an efficient implementation of the Fast Multipole Method [FMM] for the magnetic scalar potential as used in micromagnetics. We assume linearly magnetized tetrahedral sources, treat the near field directly and use analytical integration on the multipole expansion in the far field. This approach tack… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compare Palmesi et al 2 for a deeper performance analysis. Figures 2 and 3 show a decreasing error for larger meshes.…”
Section: Fmm Error Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Compare Palmesi et al 2 for a deeper performance analysis. Figures 2 and 3 show a decreasing error for larger meshes.…”
Section: Fmm Error Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…2 The FMM splits the problem into two parts. An analytic near-or direct field and a multipole approximation for the far-field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of these it is the calculation of the demagnetization field, also known as the stray field, that is the most time consuming part Abert et al [2013]. There are in general three methods that have been applied to calculate the demagnetization field: finite difference based fast Fourier transform methods, tensor-grid methods and finite-element methods, although other methods such as fast multipole methods also exist Van de Wiele et al [2008]; Palmesi et al [2017]; Kumar and Adeyeye [2017]. All methods have inherent advantages and shortcomings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%