2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Multiplexed Label-Free Imaging Sensor for Accurate Quantification of Small-Molecule Binding Kinetics

Abstract: Investigating the binding interaction of small molecules to large ligands is a compelling task for the field of drug development, as well as agro-biotechnology, since a common trait of drugs and toxins is often a low molecular weight (MW). Here, we improve the limit of detection of the Interferometric Reflectance Imaging Sensor (IRIS), a label-free, highly multiplexed biosensor, to perform small-molecule screening. In this work, characterization of small molecules binding to immobilized probes in a microarray … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The black horizontal line corresponds to the binding signal for biotin obtained with the described bulk-effect-minimization method, consistent with theoretically expected values in Chiodi, et al. 11 The refractive index difference between the analyte and buffer solution used in this study created a bulk-effect signal that is about 2 times the size of the biotin-binding signal measured here with the IRIS technique. The same refractive index difference in SPR (as simulated using a Kretcshmann configuration) would result in a bulk-effect signal that is 30 times as large as the same biotin-binding signal measured in SPR.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The black horizontal line corresponds to the binding signal for biotin obtained with the described bulk-effect-minimization method, consistent with theoretically expected values in Chiodi, et al. 11 The refractive index difference between the analyte and buffer solution used in this study created a bulk-effect signal that is about 2 times the size of the biotin-binding signal measured here with the IRIS technique. The same refractive index difference in SPR (as simulated using a Kretcshmann configuration) would result in a bulk-effect signal that is 30 times as large as the same biotin-binding signal measured in SPR.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The power of the LEDs was adjusted using adjustable LED drivers (Thorlabs LEDD1B) based on the bulk-effect signal captured in Figure 6 , and the bulk-effect minimization was confirmed with another run of 1× PBS, 1% DMSO in 1× PBS, and 1× PBS. The resulting signal is shown in Figure 8 b showing a clear binding step as expected of biotin and confirmed in similar studies, 11 and results were consistent across many trials of this experiment. Due to the high affinity of biotin to streptavidin, the binding interaction is mass-transport-limited (further discussed in Supporting Information ) and, therefore, the data serve only as a proof of concept and do not show actual kinetic information.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Accumulation of biological mass on the sensor surface increases the effective thickness from the top surface to the reference Si surface and alters the reflectance. In IRIS measurements, the molecular weight of the analyte can vary from small molecules [14] to macroparticles such as viruses [15]. The reflectance coming from the surface assumes the form:…”
Section: The Iris Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%