2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly efficient transition metal and nitrogen co-doped carbide-derived carbon electrocatalysts for anion exchange membrane fuel cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, changing the metal organic framework and optimizing the catalyst atomic structure has also become a popular research area. For instance, heterogeneous atom‐doped carbon materials have been widely studied because of their low‐cost and abundant raw materials, high catalytic activity, high chemical stability, and environmental friendliness . Moreover, porous morphology and larger electrochemical surface area also improve catalytic activity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Therefore, changing the metal organic framework and optimizing the catalyst atomic structure has also become a popular research area. For instance, heterogeneous atom‐doped carbon materials have been widely studied because of their low‐cost and abundant raw materials, high catalytic activity, high chemical stability, and environmental friendliness . Moreover, porous morphology and larger electrochemical surface area also improve catalytic activity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Compared to other highly active ORR catalysts in the literature, FeÀN-comp catalysts also measure up quite well. [30] This shows the positive effect of multi-step doping and using a composite catalyst, which provides a more beneficial morphology and efficient doping. For better comparison with the literature data, the potential was converted from SCE to RHE scale (E RHE = E SCE + 1.008 V).…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Activity Of Feànàc Catalysts For the Orrmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This mixture is then pyrolyzed and the substrate along with inactive metal phases is removed by etching in acid mixtures, which allows for control over the porosity and structure by choosing the right substrate and reagents. [29][30][31][32][33] The main advantage of CDCs over other widely-used carbon supports is the amorphous nature and extremely high specific surface area that can be achieved (typically over 2000 m 2 g À1 ) [34] with highly reproducible largescale results already shown. [17] The resulting powder is then pyrolyzed to carbonize the MOF and dope it with transition metals and nitrogen, with the MOF playing a large role in directing the porosity and structure of the resulting catalyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other case is that the hard‐templates in situ transfer to catalysts as a doping agent. The development of various 3D M−N−C materials is a hot‐topic during these years . 3D M−N−C materials are mainly divided into three typical morphologies including 3D NPs, 3D hollow spheres, and 3D porous structures.…”
Section: D Metal‐nitrogen‐carbon Materials For the Oxygen Reduction mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of various 3D MÀ NÀ C materials is a hot-topic during these years. [144][145][146][147][148] 3D MÀ NÀ C materials are mainly divided into three typical morphologies including 3D NPs, 3D hollow spheres, and 3D porous structures. In addition, 3D carbon materials also have been applied to construct the 3D MÀ NÀ C electrocatalysts, which are similar to the support of CNTs and graphene.…”
Section: D Metal-nitrogen-carbon Materials For the Oxygen Reduction mentioning
confidence: 99%