Highly efficient sparse-matrix inversion techniques and average procedures applied to collisional-radiative codes

Abstract

The behavior of non-local thermal-equilibrium (NLTE) plasmas plays a central role in many fields of modern-day physics, such as laser-produced plasmas, astrophysics, inertial or magnetic confinement fusion devices, or X-ray sources. The proper description of these media in stationary cases requires to solve linear systems of thousands or more rate equations. A possible simplification for this arduous numerical task may lie in some type of statistical average, such as configuration or superconfiguration average. However to assess the validity of this procedure and to handle cases where isolated lines play an important role, it may be important to deal with detailed levels systems. This involves matrices with sometimes billions of elements, which are rather sparse but still involve thousands of diagonals.We propose here a numerical algorithm based on the LU decomposition for such linear systems. This method turns out to be orders of magnitude faster than the traditional Gauss elimination. And at variance with alternate methods based on conjugate gradients or minimization, no convergence or accuracy issues have been faced. Some examples are discussed in connection with the krypton and tungsten cases discussed at the last NLTE meeting. Furthermore, to assess the validity of configuration average, several criteria are discussed. While a criterion based on detailed balance is relevant in cases not too far from LTE but insufficient otherwise, an alternate criterion based on the use of a fictive configuration temperature is proposed and successfully tested. It appears that detailed calculations are sometimes necessary, which supports the search for an efficient solver as the one proposed here.

Modelización de las propiedades radiativas e interacción de láseres ultraintensos con la materia

“…Para ello podemos hacer uso de métodos de resolución directos o iterativos. Existen multitud de librerías de uso libre para la resolución de este sistema mediante cualquiera de estos métodos [119,10,62]. En general, salvo para sistemas pequeños (m < 2000) el método escogido será iterativo, ya sea el gradiente biconjugado estabilizado (BiCGSTAB) o el método generalizado de mínimos residuos (GMRES).…”