2014
DOI: 10.1021/am4051487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Efficient Polymer-Based Optoelectronic Devices Using PEDOT:PSS and a GO Composite Layer as a Hole Transport Layer

Abstract: We demonstrate highly efficient polymer light-emitting diodes (PLEDs), as well as polymer solar cells (PSCs), using a solution-processable poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS):graphene oxide (GO) (PEDOT:GO) composite layer as hole transport layers (HTLs). The PEDOT:GO composite HTL layer shows enhanced charge carrier transport due to improved conductivity by benzoid-quinoid transitions with a well-matched work function between GO (4.89 eV) and PEDOT:PSS (4.95 eV). Moreover, it re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ambipolar mobility increased from 3.78 × 10 −4  cm 2 V −1 s −1 in case of PEDOT:PSS HTL to 4.04 × 10 −4  cm 2 V −1 s −1 for single GO HTL and finally to 7.47 × 10 −4  cm 2 V −1 s −1 for the device with GO/PEDOT:PSS double decked HTL, which is almost double of the either of the individual GO or PEDOT:PSS HTLs, and in good agreement with the PCEs of corresponding devices. A quantitative comparison of ambipolar mobility of the OSCs with GO, PEDOT:PSS and GO/PEDOT:PSS HTLs confirmed that use of GO/PEDOT:PSS layer promoted the charge carriers transportation and extraction, particularly the hole mobility, resulting in optimized photovoltaic performance22. Since the only difference in the device architecture is the utilization of different HTLs therefore the increase in the accumulative charge carrier mobility is predominately due to the increased hole mobility using a GO/PEDOT:PSS double decked layer that can lead to balanced charge carrier transportation with an electron-blocking ability and a reduction of the suppression between the HTL and the active layer22.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ambipolar mobility increased from 3.78 × 10 −4  cm 2 V −1 s −1 in case of PEDOT:PSS HTL to 4.04 × 10 −4  cm 2 V −1 s −1 for single GO HTL and finally to 7.47 × 10 −4  cm 2 V −1 s −1 for the device with GO/PEDOT:PSS double decked HTL, which is almost double of the either of the individual GO or PEDOT:PSS HTLs, and in good agreement with the PCEs of corresponding devices. A quantitative comparison of ambipolar mobility of the OSCs with GO, PEDOT:PSS and GO/PEDOT:PSS HTLs confirmed that use of GO/PEDOT:PSS layer promoted the charge carriers transportation and extraction, particularly the hole mobility, resulting in optimized photovoltaic performance22. Since the only difference in the device architecture is the utilization of different HTLs therefore the increase in the accumulative charge carrier mobility is predominately due to the increased hole mobility using a GO/PEDOT:PSS double decked layer that can lead to balanced charge carrier transportation with an electron-blocking ability and a reduction of the suppression between the HTL and the active layer22.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…in their recent work on planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells, used GO/PEDOT:PSS HTL structure to obtain a stable device with power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 9.74%. Similarly, Yu, Jae Choul et al 22. demonstrated highly efficient polymer light emitting diodes (PLEDs) and OPVs with GO and PEDOT:PSS composite layer as an HTL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The functional groups, in this case the epoxy and hydroxyl groups, disrupt the sp 2 conjugation of the hexagonal graphene lattice in the basal plane. Thus, GO behaves as an insulator with a large band gap of around 3.6 eV [20,21,26,27]. This implies that the ratio of GO in PEDOT:PSS-GO composite anode should not be heavy, for avoiding excessive GO leading to low conductivity of the anode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical PCEs as high as 12 % have been predicted for graphene-based organic devices [24], and it has also been proposed that graphene may favor charge carrier multiplication [24]. As for practical device applications, graphene has proved to be useful in various parts of PSCs with extraordinary performance, not only as a substitute for indium tin oxide (ITO) electrodes, but also as cathode, electron acceptor, hole extraction and electron extraction material [25][26][27][28][29][30]. In this review, we summarize the research progress about graphene-based PSCs, in which graphene-based materials were used in different layers of PSCs including electrodes, interfacial layers and active layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%