“…Serious pollution problems resulting from S-containing compounds in commercial fuels have attracted people’s focus as they cause acid rain and threaten human health, which eventually causes ecological instability. − As a traditional industrial process, hydrodesulfurization is effective for mercaptan, thioether, and other aliphatic S compounds but almost invalid for thiophenic compounds (e.g., DBT). , Therefore, reducing the content of thiophenic compounds in liquid hydrocarbon fuels is an urgent research effort. − Adsorption desulfurization is considered one of the most promising techniques, especially for ultralow sulfur enrichment owing to its relatively low cost, simple design, mild operation conditions, easy regeneration, and so forth. − To date, various porous adsorbents loaded with metal ions, like porous carbons, zeolites, and mesoporous adsorbents, have been developed for deep desulfurization. − However, it is hard to further promote the desulfurization capacity of the current adsorbents due to their less surface area, simple shape, and uncontrollable pore shape. , Recently, adsorptive desulfurization with MOFs (metal–organic frameworks) has emerged as a promising method due to the open active sites and large porosity of these frameworks. , It is well known that the key issue of the adsorption technique is the directional design and the efficient fabrication of desirable adsorbents with excellent chemical stability, good selectivity, high capacity, and so forth. Based on Pearson’s hard and soft acid–base mechanism, the thiophenic sulfur molecules (soft bases) could be firmly combined with metal ions, like Zn 2+ , Ni 2+ , and Cu 2+ (soft Lewis acid). − Additionally, the π-complexation function, another easily understood mechanism, was first developed by Yang. , This interaction is generated by donating electrons from the π-orbitals of the adsorbates to the vacant s-orbitals of metal ions and simultaneously donating d-electrons of metals to the π* orbital of the adsorbates.…”