2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly effective oxidation of roxarsone by ferrate and simultaneous arsenic removal with in situ formed ferric nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both roxarsone (ROX) and parsanilic acid (p-ASA), the two widely used organoarsenic compounds in the worldwide, contain electron-donating moieties and are readily oxidized by Fe(VI) (Xie and Cheng, 2019). It was found that the second-order rate constant for the reaction of Fe(VI) with ROX is 305 M -1 $s -1 at pH 7.0, and over 95% of total As can be removed within 10 min at [Fe(VI)] 0 /[ROX] 0 ratio of 20:1 (Yang et al, 2018a). Moreover, in comparison with the TOC removal in O 3 , HClO, and KMnO 4 treatment systems (Yang et al, 2018b), the TOC removal in the oxidation process of p-ASA by Fe(VI) is 1.6 to 38 times higher, which mainly ascribed to the in situ generated iron(III) (hydr)oxide nanoparticles.…”
Section: Organophosphorus and Organoarsenic Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both roxarsone (ROX) and parsanilic acid (p-ASA), the two widely used organoarsenic compounds in the worldwide, contain electron-donating moieties and are readily oxidized by Fe(VI) (Xie and Cheng, 2019). It was found that the second-order rate constant for the reaction of Fe(VI) with ROX is 305 M -1 $s -1 at pH 7.0, and over 95% of total As can be removed within 10 min at [Fe(VI)] 0 /[ROX] 0 ratio of 20:1 (Yang et al, 2018a). Moreover, in comparison with the TOC removal in O 3 , HClO, and KMnO 4 treatment systems (Yang et al, 2018b), the TOC removal in the oxidation process of p-ASA by Fe(VI) is 1.6 to 38 times higher, which mainly ascribed to the in situ generated iron(III) (hydr)oxide nanoparticles.…”
Section: Organophosphorus and Organoarsenic Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in comparison with the TOC removal in O 3 , HClO, and KMnO 4 treatment systems (Yang et al, 2018b), the TOC removal in the oxidation process of p-ASA by Fe(VI) is 1.6 to 38 times higher, which mainly ascribed to the in situ generated iron(III) (hydr)oxide nanoparticles. Generally, in the conversion of organoarsenic compounds by Fe(VI), -AsO(OH) 2 group is first cleaved from aromatic ring (Czaplicka et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2018a;Yang et al, 2018b). The released inorganic As(III) species can be further oxidized by Fe(VI) to As(V) species, which greatly increases the affinity of organoarsenic compounds with solid surfaces and reduces their mobility in the water (Jain et al, 2009 --As (OH) 3 ] = 2.5 Â 10 6 M -1 $s -1 ) is comparable with those of As (III) with other oxidants (k app [HOCl-As(OH) (Sharma et al, 2007).…”
Section: Organophosphorus and Organoarsenic Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15,21 Therefore, compared with the pure adsorption, the combination of adsorption and chemical oxidation is recognized as a more promising strategy because the removal efficiency of total arsenic could be improved after the oxidative transformation of p-ASA. 22,23 For example, both Fenton reaction and ferrate are effective for the oxidation of p-ASA and subsequent removal of the total arsenic species via the in situ flocculation of the newly formed ferric ions. 23−25 However, the non-recyclability of the Fe-based reagents makes the processes costly for application.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 ] Arsenic pollution mainly results from the discharge of industrial production, agricultural production, natural volcanic eruption, and some natural phenomena. [ 2 ] In most arsenic‐contaminated groundwater, arsenic concentrations range from 0.5 to 2.5 mg·l −1 . [ 3, 4 ] In some industrial wastewater, it can reach more than 100 mg·l −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 11, 12 ] Among these methods, adsorption is one of the most promising methods because of its high efficiency, low cost, and simple operation. [ 12, 13 ] However, traditional adsorbents such as activated carbons, goethite, carbon nanotubes, and iron and aluminum oxides [ 2, 7, 11, 12 ] did not possess the adequate adsorption capacity. Therefore, it is of great significance to synthesize new adsorbents with high efficiency and high adsorption capacity for removing organic arsenics from the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%