2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.662715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Diverse Shrub Willows (Salix L.) Share Highly Similar Plastomes

Abstract: Plastome phylogenomics is used in a broad range of studies where single markers do not bear enough information. Phylogenetic reconstruction in the genus Salix is difficult due to the lack of informative characters and reticulate evolution. Here, we use a genome skimming approach to reconstruct 41 complete plastomes of 32 Eurasian and North American Salix species representing different lineages, different ploidy levels, and separate geographic regions. We combined our plastomes with published data from Genbank … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the six Salix samples, between 5.6% and 11.7% of the reads mapped to the respective references, and it was possible to recover complete plastomes for all samples. This mapping percentage is within the range reported in a recent study of Salix plastomes based on non‐archival, silica‐dried fresh material, for which the percentage of mapped reads varied between 3.1% and 23.5% (Wagner et al, 2021 ). For Xanthium , 0.1–3.1% of reads mapped to the reference, and only 21–83% of the plastome could be recovered.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For the six Salix samples, between 5.6% and 11.7% of the reads mapped to the respective references, and it was possible to recover complete plastomes for all samples. This mapping percentage is within the range reported in a recent study of Salix plastomes based on non‐archival, silica‐dried fresh material, for which the percentage of mapped reads varied between 3.1% and 23.5% (Wagner et al, 2021 ). For Xanthium , 0.1–3.1% of reads mapped to the reference, and only 21–83% of the plastome could be recovered.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In addition to challenges with the retention of multiple nrDNA copies, there is also ample evidence consistent with incomplete lineage sorting, with individuals with multiple samples combining variation greatly predating speciation, including variants across the tetraploid clade which was previously estimated to be 7.3 million years old ( Gussarova et al, 2008 ). Regardless of the evolutionary processes shaping variation, these results highlight that an “extended barcode” ( Coissac et al, 2016 ) based on plastid and nrDNA from genome skimming will fail to identify species in Euphrasia , as well as a range of other complex groups like willows ( Wagner et al, 2021 ). Here, researchers should instead look to sample the nuclear genome, using methods such as whole-genome resequencing or sequence capture with target enrichment probes ( Johnson et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene tree discordance is a pervasive feature of plant phylogenies, with numerous studies revealing diverse and conflicting topologies among loci within a genome ( Stull et al, 2020 ; Rose et al, 2021 ; Wagner et al, 2021 ). While discordance is frequently seen as a barrier to species tree reconstruction and an impediment to taxonomic and systematic research, characterizing discordance can provide major insights into evolutionary processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The widely used plastid markers or whole plastomes in plant phylogenies are mostly maternally inherited and hence cannot reflect reticulate relationships. Moreover, plastomes are often too conservative and would not provide sufficient resolution in phylogenetic analyses of less diverged lineages, as they occur in recently formed hybrids or neopolyploids [192]. Combinations of plastid and biparentally inherited nuclear markers, however, often reveal conflicting phylogenetic signals as a first indicator of reticulate relationships.…”
Section: Recognition Of Existing Lineages: Methodical Advances In The...mentioning
confidence: 99%