Highly cited educational technology journal articles: a descriptive and critical analysis

Abstract

Citations are valuable capital in the academy as the number of citations is the most frequently used indicator in evaluating the quality of papers, journals, researchers, and universities. Thus, the characteristics of highly cited articles (HCA) have become a common research topic but the approach has been mainly descriptive with no profound critical reflection of what kind of research is cited, where the research is from, where the research is published, and what do these things mean for edtech research. This paper contributes to this need by providing a descriptive and critical analysis of 200 highly cited articles from 10 edtech journals. To summarize the key findings, a 'typical' edtech HCA is a Western-based review article or quantitative research paper reporting positive findings from higher education, published in a highimpact factor general edtech journal by a major publisher.

A Worldwide Bibliometric Analysis of Published Literature Assessing Fear of COVID-19

“…This rapid increase reflects an increasing concern about outbreak-related mental health [ 38 ]. In this context, citations are a valuable asset in academia because the number of citations is the most commonly used measurement to assess the quality of papers, journals, researchers, and universities [ 39 ]. According to our findings, journal articles are the most commonly published document type; these findings are in agreement with those of other studies [ 38 , 40 ].…”

Learning with Digital Media: A Systematic Review of Students’ Use in African Higher Education

“…On the other hand, the research designs adopted by the included studies appeared balanced and reflected the standpoint of authors who believe there is a growing recognition of a balance in research approaches used in educational technology research (Bailey, 2014;West & Borup, 2014). However, the debate regarding the most effective design for educational technology interventions is far from settled (Jou et al, 2016;Mertala et al, 2022). The debate has to be elevated by developing a critical approach to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of various designs for effective interventions.…”

Editorial: Special Issue ”Technology in Mathematics Education”

“…Recently Mertala et al (2022) made a descriptive and critical analysis of highly cited educational technology articles. They observed that in high impact factor journals by major publishers it is easier to publish positive than critical findings of the use of technology in education.…”