2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05205-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly active enzymes by automated combinatorial backbone assembly and sequence design

Abstract: Automated design of enzymes with wild-type-like catalytic properties has been a long-standing but elusive goal. Here, we present a general, automated method for enzyme design through combinatorial backbone assembly. Starting from a set of homologous yet structurally diverse enzyme structures, the method assembles new backbone combinations and uses Rosetta to optimize the amino acid sequence, while conserving key catalytic residues. We apply this method to two unrelated enzyme families with TIM-barrel folds, gl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recently showed that evolution-guided atomistic design calculations, which use phylogenetic analysis to guide atomistic design calculations 61 , enabled the automated, accurate and effective design of large and topologically complex soluble proteins. Designed proteins exhibited atomic accuracy, high expression levels, stability 54,55 , binding affinity, specificity 59 , and catalytic efficiency 57,58 . Membrane proteins are typically large and challenging targets for conventional protein-engineering and design methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We recently showed that evolution-guided atomistic design calculations, which use phylogenetic analysis to guide atomistic design calculations 61 , enabled the automated, accurate and effective design of large and topologically complex soluble proteins. Designed proteins exhibited atomic accuracy, high expression levels, stability 54,55 , binding affinity, specificity 59 , and catalytic efficiency 57,58 . Membrane proteins are typically large and challenging targets for conventional protein-engineering and design methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that as observed in studies of mutational effects on stability in soluble proteins, the correlation coefficient between computed and observed values was low (Pearson r 2 =0.21 and 0.02 for ref2015_memb and RosettaMembrane, respectively) [51][52][53][54] . Such low correlation coefficients provide an impetus for improving the energy function; however, as we previously demonstrated, discriminating stabilizing from destabilizing mutations is sufficient to enable the design of accurate, stable, and functionally efficient proteins [54][55][56][57][58][59] . We next tested sequence-recovery rates using combinatorial sequence optimisation based on ref2015, ref2015_memb, and RosettaMembrane in a benchmark of 20 non-redundant structures (<80% sequence identity) ranging in size from 124-765 amino acids 60 .…”
Section: Ab Initio Structure Prediction In Membrane Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1b). To account for this rugged energy landscape, protein designers have developed a variety of methods for performing backbone sampling along with sequence optimization 102 . One approach that has worked well when designing de novo proteins is to iterate between rotamer-based sequence optimization and gradient-based minimization of torsion angles (backbone and side chain) 72,77 (see also Box 1).…”
Section: Optimizing the Protein Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the quality values (C-score = 0; TM = 0.71 ± 0.11; RMSD = 6.8 ± 4.1 Å) obtained during this second modelling round suggested some important structural differences with those PDB identified as structural neighbours. Curiously, 6FHF is an unusual GH10 sequence, because it was designed by using rational protein design approaches, and generated by automated combinatorial backbone assembly and sequence design 67 . This observation supports the importance of using metagenomic approaches for the discovery of enzymes with unusual sequences.…”
Section: D Modelling Analysis Of Glycosyl Hydrolasesmentioning
confidence: 99%