Highlights of ICD-11 Classification of Mental, Behavioral, and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Abstract

International classification of diseases (ICD)-11 is expected to be operative on the first day of January 2022. The key principle in this revision is simplification of the coding structure, electronic tooling, along with incorporation of advancements that occurred over past 30 years, since the publication of ICD-10. For a classification of mental disorders, development of the ICD-11 has been the most global, multilingual, multidisciplinary, and participative revision process by far. Adoption of a life-span approach, incorporation of a dimensional approach, provision of consistent and systematically characterized information as per recent evidence, and culture-related guidance along with effort for destigmatization are the salient features of this revision. In this review, we highlighted the process of developing the clinical description and diagnostic guidelines (CDDG), discussed the new disorders that were added with rationale, and last described the salient features of disorder grouping, pointing the key changes from ICD-10.

Impaired Personality Functioning in Children and Adolescents Assessed with the LoPF-Q 6-18 PR in Parent-Report and Convergence with Maladaptive Personality Traits and Personality Structure in School and Clinic Samples

“…This study aimed to provide an age-and informant-adapted measurement tool for assessing Impaired Personality Functioning (IPF) in children and adolescents in parent-report. This was conducted in response to the ICD-11's call for a lifespan approach and the assertion that, given the appropriate assessment tools, early indicators of psychopathology can be identified even at younger ages [4]. The LoPF-Q 6-18 PR (Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire-Parent Report for 6-18 year olds) was developed to meet this need.…”

“…Another significant change promoted by the ICD-11 is the introduction of the 'lifespan approach' [4]. This concept suggests that psychiatric disorders should be understood with respect to early signs and precursors in childhood, reflecting a shift in the conceptualization of these disorders [5].…”

To love and work: A longitudinal study of everyday life factors in recovery from borderline personality disorder

“…Increasingly, dominant diagnostic and classification systems are moving towards classification of personality within a spectrum of severity (e.g., personality functioning, American Psychiatric Association, 2013 ; personality organisation, Lingiardi & McWilliams, 2017 ; and personality severity, World Health Organization, 2019 ). While there currently exists a number of effective and evidence‐based treatments for personality disorder (Bateman et al, 2015 ), a subgroup of patients remain unwell despite therapeutic intervention (Woodbridge, Reis, et al, 2021 ; Woodbridge, Townsend, et al, 2021 ).…”

MKB-11 Klasifikacija Duševnih Poremećaja – Izazov Za Integraciju Psihodinamičkog Pristupa

“…The development of the chapter addressing mental disorders (Neurodevelopmental, Mental, and Behavioral Disorders) represents the first major revision of the world's most prominent classification of mental disorders, which took nearly 30 years to be completed (8). Reed et al (9) emphasize that this revision represents the largest global, multidisciplinary and participatory process of revising the i kliničkih smjernica koje su sastavni dio MKB-a (7). MKB-11 uvodi niz općih promjena (promjene strukture sustava, terminologije, šifriranja, uporaba u digitalnom okruženju itd.)…”