2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher versus lower blood pressure targets after cardiac arrest: Systematic review with individual patient data meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four randomized controlled trials have now investigated differential MAP targets, comparing the conventional target of 63 to 65 mm Hg with higher targets of 72 to 100 mm Hg. 4 Results were consistent in showing that a higher MAP target is unlikely to reduce mortality or improve neurological recovery after OHCA.…”
Section: See Article By Grand Et Almentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Four randomized controlled trials have now investigated differential MAP targets, comparing the conventional target of 63 to 65 mm Hg with higher targets of 72 to 100 mm Hg. 4 Results were consistent in showing that a higher MAP target is unlikely to reduce mortality or improve neurological recovery after OHCA.…”
Section: See Article By Grand Et Almentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Comparisons were made using the Chisquare test or Mann-Whitney test when appropriate. Time to AKI was analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression, with the results reported as hazard ratios (HR) (95% confidence interval [22]). First, we entered age, no bystander CPR, non-shockable initial rhythm, hypertension, time to ROSC and the high-MAP target into five separate unadjusted models: (1) time to AKI of any severity (AKI KDIGO 1-3), (2) time to severe AKI (AKI KDIGO 2-3), (3) time to AKI of any severity (AKI KDIGO 1-3) when admission creatinine was used as baseline, (4) time to AKI of any severity (AKI KDIGO 1-3) when modified AKI KDIGO classification was based on creatinine and the average daily UO, and (5) time to AKI of any severity (AKI KDIGO 1-3) during the first 48 h after OHCA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the evidence remains inconclusive, with certain studies suggesting variances in markers of cardiac and neurological injury, findings that were not substantiated by the extensive BOX trial published in 2022 [27 ▪▪ ]. A recent meta-analysis failed to identify any compelling evidence supporting improved outcomes associated with a higher MAP target [28 ▪ ]. It is worth noting that the existing evidence can only exclude a relative effect exceeding 25%, translating to an absolute difference of 10−15% [28 ▪ ].…”
Section: Circulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis failed to identify any compelling evidence supporting improved outcomes associated with a higher MAP target [28 ▪ ]. It is worth noting that the existing evidence can only exclude a relative effect exceeding 25%, translating to an absolute difference of 10−15% [28 ▪ ]. Future research endeavors should center on investigating whether targeting a higher MAP may yield a more modest effect and whether specific patient subpopulations might derive distinct benefits from alternative MAP targets.…”
Section: Circulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation