2020
DOI: 10.1177/0269881120936509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher venlafaxine serum concentrations necessary for clinical improvement? Time to re-evaluate the therapeutic reference range of venlafaxine

Abstract: Background: The therapeutic reference range for venlafaxine in antidepressant treatment has been defined as 100 to 400 ng/mL. However, in an everyday setting active moiety concentrations above the therapeutic reference range were often reported. Aim: The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the therapeutic reference range of venlafaxine. Methods: In-patients (⩽60 years) with major depressive episodes receiving antidepressant monotherapy with venlafaxine during routine clinical treatment were included in this o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Shams et al used 25–75 percentiles, which may be the primary reason why the upper limit is considerably lower than the therapeutic analytical ranges in our study, which is on average from 550 to 2555 nmol/L when applying 10–90 percentiles ( Table 2 ). A higher upper limit than the one presented in the guideline was suggested by Reis et al [ 8 ], and Scherf-Clavel et al also argued for a higher therapeutic reference range for the total moiety of venlafaxine and the active metabolite o-desmethyl-venlafaxine [ 12 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Shams et al used 25–75 percentiles, which may be the primary reason why the upper limit is considerably lower than the therapeutic analytical ranges in our study, which is on average from 550 to 2555 nmol/L when applying 10–90 percentiles ( Table 2 ). A higher upper limit than the one presented in the guideline was suggested by Reis et al [ 8 ], and Scherf-Clavel et al also argued for a higher therapeutic reference range for the total moiety of venlafaxine and the active metabolite o-desmethyl-venlafaxine [ 12 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly, these studies relied on a single laboratory test developed in-house, and verification using modern techniques is therefore necessary. The continual re-evaluation of therapeutic reference ranges is also important as the treatment paradigm of a drug may change over time [ 12 ]. For these reasons, a ratification is warranted before a published range can be used in the clinic, and the agreement with current laboratory methods needs to be ensured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, our data show the participation of JNK-mediated MAPK-pathway [10,15] in the regulation of xenobiotic metabolism in liver cells. In particular, the role of this second messenger in relation to the biochemical transformation of one of the most effective antidepressants venlafaxine [7] is reduced to inhibition of its transformation. At the same time, the results of experiments indicate that the JNK inhibitor accelerated metabolism of this drug.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this effect of protein kinase blocker is obviously mediated via its participation in the regulation of activity not only of CYP2D6 (responsible for the formation of O-DVLF), but also CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and CYP2C9 (catalyzing the formation of inactive metabolites N,O-didesmetylvenlafaxine and their glucuronide conjugates) [4,9]. The discovered properties of the JNK inhibitor can be used to develop a fundamentally new approach to personification and increase the effectiveness of venlafaxine antidepressant therapy [7,8]. Based on the identified phenomena, JNK inactivation in liver cells can increase the level of drug transformation in low metabolizers (persons with low CYP2D6 expression, or in patients with liver diseases [3,4,6]) to the normal level (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation