The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1612181114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher-than-ballistic conduction of viscous electron flows

Abstract: Strongly interacting electrons can move in a neatly coordinated way, reminiscent of the movement of viscous fluids. Here, we show that in viscous flows, interactions facilitate transport, allowing conductance to exceed the fundamental Landauer's ballistic limit G ball . The effect is particularly striking for the flow through a viscous point contact, a constriction exhibiting the quantum mechanical ballistic transport at T = 0 but governed by electron hydrodynamics at elevated temperatures. We develop a theory… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

15
215
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
15
215
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our theory, the Gurzhi resistance exceeds the inviscid Drude resistance. Note, that this is not a contradiction to either the recent observation of super-ballistic flow in graphene 6,53 or the original Gurzhi effect 52 . The reason is that we are considering the electronic fluid in the hydrodynamic regime to begin with and do not compare it with a ballistic (Knudsen-like 54 ) regime where the resistance is determined by the scattering off the system boundaries or large (macroscopic) obstacles.…”
mentioning
(Expert classified)
“…In our theory, the Gurzhi resistance exceeds the inviscid Drude resistance. Note, that this is not a contradiction to either the recent observation of super-ballistic flow in graphene 6,53 or the original Gurzhi effect 52 . The reason is that we are considering the electronic fluid in the hydrodynamic regime to begin with and do not compare it with a ballistic (Knudsen-like 54 ) regime where the resistance is determined by the scattering off the system boundaries or large (macroscopic) obstacles.…”
mentioning
(Expert classified)
“…The quantity G ν is calculated for the Stokes flow through a PC in the extreme hydrodynamic regime (that is, for the e-e scattering length l ee w). The additive form of equation (2) is valid 18,19 for all values of l ee /w, even close to the ballistic regime l ee w. This implies that G should increase with T (in the first approximation 15,27 , as ∝1/l ee ∝ T 2 ), which leads to the initial drop in resistance (Fig. 1e).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…To describe the non-metallic behaviour in our PCs, we first invoke the recent theory 18 that predicts that e-e scattering modifies equation (1) as…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, motivated by recent experimental progress [3][4][5], there has been considerable theoretical work using hydrodynamics to study thermoelectric transport [2,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and it is therefore of interest to see how our general results on diffusion manifest themselves in this particular context. More specifically, we will study this within the context of relativistic hydrodynamics, describing the hydrodynamic limit of a relativistic quantum field theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%