1989
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.39.1774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher retardation and multipole corrections to the dipole angular distribution of 1sphotoelectrons at low energies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
53
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
13
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of retardation corrections to the imaginary anomalous scattering factor is an artifact of the hydrogenic formalism used here. It has been shown that such corrections do exist in neutral atoms (Bechler & Pratt, 1989). …”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of retardation corrections to the imaginary anomalous scattering factor is an artifact of the hydrogenic formalism used here. It has been shown that such corrections do exist in neutral atoms (Bechler & Pratt, 1989). …”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At these high energies, non-dipole effects are expected to occur. One has to distinguish between first-order non-dipole effects that cause a forward/backward asymmetry in the angular distribution 27,28 and second-order non-dipole effects that influence also the plane perpendicular to the propagation direction of the light 18 ; note that this plane is traditionally referred to as the dipole plane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screened wave functions have been used to accurately calculate nondipole asymmetries of atoms over energy ranges extending from near threshold to thousands of electron volts [21][22][23]. Since nondipole asymmetries are generally proportional to the photon momentum or energy, relatively large asymmetries are observed for inner-shell electrons in the x-ray regime [23,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model neglects screening and may be inaccurate as the energy is lowered toward threshold [21][22][23]. Recent theories adopt the "first retardation correction" to the dipole approximation, which includes cross terms of electric dipole (E1) photoionization amplitudes with electric quadrupole (E2) and magnetic dipole (M1) amplitudes [21,22,[24][25][26]. For photoionization of randomly oriented atoms or molecules by a linearly polarized photon beam, the differential cross section can be expressed as [24] dσ d (θ,φ) = σ 4π {1 + β e P 2 (cos θ ) + (δ + γ cos 2 θ ) sin θ cos φ}, (1) where σ is the angle-integrated cross section, β e is the electric dipole anisotropy parameter, P 2 (cos θ ) = (3 cos 2 θ − 1)/2 is the second Legendre polynomial, and δ and γ are the first-order nondipole asymmetry parameters resulting from E1-E2 and E1-M1 cross terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation