2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-8368(01)00016-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher-order zig-zag model for analysis of thick composite beams with inclusion of transverse normal stress and sublaminates approximations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
84
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is reminded that in [55] this model has been already proven to be accurate and computationally efficient when closed form solutions are considered, since it achieves the accuracy of layerwise models with just five d.o.f. Therefore, the aim of present numerical results is neither that of: a) discussing the advantages of the zigzag modeling approach here used, nor discussing the advantages offered by its variable kinematics, as both aspects have been already comprehensively overviewed in [43,[51][52][53][54][55][56]; b) nor discussing the relative merits of a physically-based zigzag representation like the present one over the Murakami's zigzag function just based upon kinematic assumptions, because both modeling options have been already compared and extensively discussed in [17]; c) finally, nor comparing the available displacement-based and mixed theories incorporating zigzag functions to other existing models and nor to discuss their fidelity to 3D exact elasticity or finite element solutions, since assessments were already given among many others in the references quoted in [17] that have shown their value.…”
Section: Numerical Applications and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is reminded that in [55] this model has been already proven to be accurate and computationally efficient when closed form solutions are considered, since it achieves the accuracy of layerwise models with just five d.o.f. Therefore, the aim of present numerical results is neither that of: a) discussing the advantages of the zigzag modeling approach here used, nor discussing the advantages offered by its variable kinematics, as both aspects have been already comprehensively overviewed in [43,[51][52][53][54][55][56]; b) nor discussing the relative merits of a physically-based zigzag representation like the present one over the Murakami's zigzag function just based upon kinematic assumptions, because both modeling options have been already compared and extensively discussed in [17]; c) finally, nor comparing the available displacement-based and mixed theories incorporating zigzag functions to other existing models and nor to discuss their fidelity to 3D exact elasticity or finite element solutions, since assessments were already given among many others in the references quoted in [17] that have shown their value.…”
Section: Numerical Applications and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damage is simulated reducing the elastic moduli, according to the ply discount theory. Simply-supported, sandwich beams with damaged faces and/or core, undergoing sinusoidal transverse loading are considered and, in addition, the damage is assumed to be distributed over the entire length, because in this case the exact elasticity solution can be still found [43] and used for comparisons. Owing to the reduction of elastic moduli used for simulating the damage rise, intricate through-the-thickness distributions of out-of-plane stresses take place as a consequence of asymmetric, distinctly different properties, which make the samples considered a very severe test case for the models.…”
Section: Numerical Applications and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations