2013
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1309.1085
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher Order Corrections in Minimal Supergravity Models of Inflation

Sergio Ferrara,
Renata Kallosh,
Andrei Linde
et al.
Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smallness of the dimensionless coupling constant λ n does not certainly imply that a fine-tuning is necessary. For example, in [9], R 4 term was proposed to be suppressed by the Planck scale and then the upper bound on the effective dimensionless coupling becomes ξ ∼ λ 4 (M p /M ) 6 < ∼ 10 26 which is much larger than one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The smallness of the dimensionless coupling constant λ n does not certainly imply that a fine-tuning is necessary. For example, in [9], R 4 term was proposed to be suppressed by the Planck scale and then the upper bound on the effective dimensionless coupling becomes ξ ∼ λ 4 (M p /M ) 6 < ∼ 10 26 which is much larger than one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…+other higher derivative terms), (6) where c i are the dimensionless couplings. The higher derivative terms may also originate from the supergravity [8,9]. Here one point we want to mention is that in [9] the correction term of R 4 was proposed to be suppressed by the Planck scale M p = 1/κ, not M s , in the new minimal supergravity model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Originally, the model was motivated by the one-loop corrections to the Einstein-Hilbert action resulting from vacuum quantum fluctuations in the matter sector at sufficiently high energies [6,8,9], which can be taken into account effectively by adding an R 2 -term to the gravitational action. Recently, possibly motivated by its excellent fit to the CMB data (see for example [10]) there has been increased interest in the model in the context of supergravity [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] (see Ref. [24] for a more complete discussion on the subject), as well as in other quantum gravity contexts [25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under an appropriate Weyl transformation of the metric, that absorbs the auxiliary field dependent coefficient of the scalar curvature, the gravity sector becomes of the Einstein-Hilbert form and the auxiliary fields become dynamical. This duality between a given f (R) gravity and its Einstein form is not so easily implemented in the framework of a supergravity theory [3][4][5][6]. Nevertheless, there is strong motivation for studying f (R) supergravities based mainly on the fact that R + R 2 supergravities provide a fruitful framework to describe cosmological inflation [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%