Abstract:This expanded survey of ITS sequences represents the largest analysis of
molecular data ever attempted on Eucalyptus. Sequences
of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA
were included in an analysis of 90 species of
Eucalyptus s.s. and 28 species representing eight other
genera (Allosyncarpia, Angophora,
Arillastrum, Corymbia,
Eucalyptopsis, Stockwellia,
Lophostemon and Metrosideros). The
results of the study indicate that Angophora and
Corymbia form a well-supported clade th… Show more
“…Although only a few taxa from the present study were included in more recent phylogenies, the relationships found here were generally consistent with the findings of Steane et al (1999Steane et al ( , 2002Steane et al ( , 2011, for the relationship of Eucalyptus obliqua and E. regnans) and Bayly and Ladiges (2007, for the close relationship of E. triflora, E. spectatrix and E. paliformis). The results from the present study support many of the relationships proposed by Ladiges et al (1989), Hill (2002) and Brooker (2000).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationships and The Monophyly Of The Green Ashessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The phylogenies produced here were more resolved than were previous phylogenies of subgenus Eucalyptus using traditional one-region sequence data (e.g. Steane et al 1999Steane et al , 2002Bayly and Ladiges 2007). These findings demonstrate that phylogenetic analyses based on DArT markers can provide insights into evolutionary relationships among Table 2 (Column 6).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationships and The Monophyly Of The Green Ashesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The development of sequence datasets has enhanced our understanding of relationships between eucalypt genera and major subgenera (e.g. Udovicic et al 1995;Steane et al 1999Steane et al , 2002Udovicic and Ladiges 2000;Whittock et al 2003;Parra-O. et al 2006Parra-O.…”
Abstract. Eucalyptus is a genus that occurs in a range of habitats in Australia, Papua New Guinea, Timor, Sulawesi and the Philippines, with several species being used as sources of timber and fibre. However, despite its ecological and commercial significance, understanding its evolutionary history remains a challenge. The focus of the present study is the green ashes (subgenus Eucalyptus section Eucalyptus). Although previous studies, based primarily on morphology, suggest that the green ashes form a monophyletic group, there has been disagreement concerning the divergence of taxa. The present study aims to estimate the phylogeny of the green ashes and closely related eucalypts (37 taxa from over 50 locations in south-eastern Australia), using genome-wide analyses based on Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT). Results of analyses were similar in topology and consistent with previous phylogenies based on sequence data. Many of the relationships supported those proposed by earlier workers. However, other relationships, particularly of taxa within the Sydney region and Blue Mountains, were not consistent with previous classifications. These findings raise important questions concerning how we define species and discern relationships in Eucalyptus and may have implications for other plant species, particularly those with a complex evolutionary history where hybridisation and recombination have occurred.
“…Although only a few taxa from the present study were included in more recent phylogenies, the relationships found here were generally consistent with the findings of Steane et al (1999Steane et al ( , 2002Steane et al ( , 2011, for the relationship of Eucalyptus obliqua and E. regnans) and Bayly and Ladiges (2007, for the close relationship of E. triflora, E. spectatrix and E. paliformis). The results from the present study support many of the relationships proposed by Ladiges et al (1989), Hill (2002) and Brooker (2000).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationships and The Monophyly Of The Green Ashessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The phylogenies produced here were more resolved than were previous phylogenies of subgenus Eucalyptus using traditional one-region sequence data (e.g. Steane et al 1999Steane et al , 2002Bayly and Ladiges 2007). These findings demonstrate that phylogenetic analyses based on DArT markers can provide insights into evolutionary relationships among Table 2 (Column 6).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationships and The Monophyly Of The Green Ashesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The development of sequence datasets has enhanced our understanding of relationships between eucalypt genera and major subgenera (e.g. Udovicic et al 1995;Steane et al 1999Steane et al , 2002Udovicic and Ladiges 2000;Whittock et al 2003;Parra-O. et al 2006Parra-O.…”
Abstract. Eucalyptus is a genus that occurs in a range of habitats in Australia, Papua New Guinea, Timor, Sulawesi and the Philippines, with several species being used as sources of timber and fibre. However, despite its ecological and commercial significance, understanding its evolutionary history remains a challenge. The focus of the present study is the green ashes (subgenus Eucalyptus section Eucalyptus). Although previous studies, based primarily on morphology, suggest that the green ashes form a monophyletic group, there has been disagreement concerning the divergence of taxa. The present study aims to estimate the phylogeny of the green ashes and closely related eucalypts (37 taxa from over 50 locations in south-eastern Australia), using genome-wide analyses based on Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT). Results of analyses were similar in topology and consistent with previous phylogenies based on sequence data. Many of the relationships supported those proposed by earlier workers. However, other relationships, particularly of taxa within the Sydney region and Blue Mountains, were not consistent with previous classifications. These findings raise important questions concerning how we define species and discern relationships in Eucalyptus and may have implications for other plant species, particularly those with a complex evolutionary history where hybridisation and recombination have occurred.
“…Although based on a small sample of eudesmid species, analyses of Sale et al (1993, chloroplast DNA) and Udovicic and Ladiges (2000, chloroplast and nuclear DNA) provided further support for the monophyly of the subgenus, in addition to morphology discussed above. In a large sample of ITS nuclear rDNA sequences for species of Eucalyptus, including six eudesmids, Steane et al (2002) also found subgenus Eudesmia to be monophyletic, and related to subgenus Eucalyptus (the 'monocalypt' clade) and E. tenuipes (Maiden & Blakely) Blakely & C.T.White, although nodes lacked bootstrap support.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outgroup taxa included were E. curtisii Blakely & C.T.White (monotypic subgenus Acerosae), E. tenuipes (subgenus Cuboidea) and E. cloeziana F.Muell. (monotypic subgenus Idiogenes) based on previous eucalypt studies Sale et al 1996;Steane et al 2002). As indicated by their treatment as subgenera by Brooker (2000), there is evidence from morphology and molecular data that these species are outside the main clades of Eucalyptus (subgenera Eudesmia, Eucalyptus and Symphyomyrtus) and therefore they are useful as outgroups.…”
Abstract. Phylogenetic analysis of Eucalyptus subgenus Eudesmia is presented on the basis of the following three datasets: sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the external transcribed spacer (ETS) regions from nuclear rDNA, sequences of the psbA-trnH intergenic spacer region from chloroplast DNA, and morphological characters, including stamen bundling, operculum development, seeds and trichomes. Studies of floral development were essential for understanding the morphology of mature flowers and interpretation of synapomorphy and homoplasy. A summary phylogeny was constructed from a maximum parsimony analysis of those nodes coded as characters that had support in the molecular trees together with morphological characters. A revised infra-subgeneric classification is presented on the basis of the summary phylogeny, and compared with classifications of Johnson (1998) andBrooker (2000). Differences relate to relationships between clades and taxonomic rank (sections, series and subseries) and valid names of Brooker (2000) are conserved where possible. One main clade of 14 species (section Limbatae), many of mallee growth form, was found in all analyses; this clade is distributed in the South-West of Western Australia and adjacent Interzone and desert areas. A second main clade (section Complanatae) occurs in the northern and eastern tropical and subtropical regions of Australia, including Kimberley, Arnhem, Queensland and New South Wales. This section includes E. tetrodonta, previously treated as an isolated taxon in a monotypic section; however, this species is related to E. baileyana, E. similis, E. lirata and series Miniatae. The hypothesised phylogeny provides a framework for further analyses of biogeography and ecology, including functional traits.
The ongoing reclassification of higher plant genera (their division, combining and recircumscription) is the cause of extensive modifications to binomials. Many genus reclassifications have been far more taxonomically disruptive than necessary to achieve monophyletic genera. We suggest six rules that should be followed when considering genus reclassifications to minimise any taxonomic disruption and maintain the stability of genus‐species binomials without compromising their scientific validity. Here, we apply these rules to the eucalypts (Myrtaceae), a well‐known group of 840 tree and shrub species that dominate the Australian continent and have worldwide economic importance. Traditionally, most eucalypts have been placed in the genus Eucalyptus. However, the genus‐level classification of the eucalypts has been in a state of flux since 1995, when the segregate genus Corymbia was described, resulting in new binomials for over 100 species, including a number of well‐known species. More recently, the segregate genus Blakella has been described, again resulting in numerous new binomials, and again including a number of well‐known and widely grown species. Here, we demonstrate that the genus‐level classification of Brooker provided far less taxonomic disruption compared to the three‐genus classification of Hill and Johnson and the four‐genus classification of Crisp & al., while still achieving genus‐level monophyly (as understood at the time). We also demonstrate that a one‐genus classification will minimise any future genus‐level taxonomic disruption that would otherwise occur and provides the greatest taxonomic utility for the range of users dealing with this important group of plants as we continue to gain a deeper understanding of the relationships between taxa.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.