2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpur.2013.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher integrability of the gradient for minimizers of the 2 d Mumford–Shah energy

Abstract: We prove the existence of an exponent p > 2 with the property that the approximate gradient of any local minimizer of the 2-dimensional Mumford-Shah energy belongs to L p loc .Nous démontrons l'éxistence d'un exposant p > 2 tel que le gradient approximé d'une fonction 2-dimensionelle quelconque qui minimise localement l'énergie de Mumford-Shah appartientà l'èspace L p loc .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A positive answer to the above conjecture was given in [7] when n = 2. The proof there strongly relies on the two-dimensional assumption, since it uses the description of minimal Caccioppoli partitions.…”
Section: S(u K)[b] ≤ M S(v H)[b]mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A positive answer to the above conjecture was given in [7] when n = 2. The proof there strongly relies on the two-dimensional assumption, since it uses the description of minimal Caccioppoli partitions.…”
Section: S(u K)[b] ≤ M S(v H)[b]mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The higher integrability of the gradient has been first established by De Lellis and Focardi [35] in dimension 2. Following a classical path, the key ingredient to establish Theorem 3.9 is a reverse Hölder inequality for the gradient, which we state independently (see [35,Theorem 1.3]).…”
Section: Higher Integrability Of the Gradient In Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We point out that Bucur and Luckhaus [16], independently from [35], have been able to improve the ideas in Theorem 2.10 carrying on the proof without the 2-dimensional limitation via a delicate induction argument. Their approach leads to a remarkable monotonicity formula for (a truncated version of) the energy valid for a broad class of approximate minimizers that shall be the topic of the next subsection 2.4.…”
Section: Corollary 213 (De Lellis and Focardimentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations