2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-009-0459-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher Himalayan Shear Zone, Sutlej section: structural geology and extrusion mechanism by various combinations of simple shear, pure shear and channel flow in shifting modes

Abstract: The Higher Himalayan Shear Zone (HHSZ) in the Sutlej section reveals (1) top-to-SW ductile shearing, (2) top-to-NE ductile shearing in the upper-and the lower strands of the South Tibetan Detachment System (STDS U , STDS L ), and (3) top-to-SW brittle shearing corroborated by trapezoid-shaped minerals in micro-scale. In the proposed extrusion model of the HHSZ, the E 1 -phase during 25-19 Ma is marked by simple shearing of the upper subchannel defined by the upper strand of the Main Central Thrust (MCT U ) and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
4
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such angular relation conforms with the field observations from other areas (e.g. Mukherjee and Koyi 2010;Mukherjee 2010Mukherjee , 2013a. It is significant that this type of Riedel shears may be linked to the P or Y deformation bands within a very narrow, up to few centimetre wide zones that covers the area in the close vicinity of the fault surface.…”
Section: Sandstonessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Such angular relation conforms with the field observations from other areas (e.g. Mukherjee and Koyi 2010;Mukherjee 2010Mukherjee , 2013a. It is significant that this type of Riedel shears may be linked to the P or Y deformation bands within a very narrow, up to few centimetre wide zones that covers the area in the close vicinity of the fault surface.…”
Section: Sandstonessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In other words, trapezium-shaped grains with straight grain boundaries were only considered as thrust slices. A similar precaution was also adopted by Mukherjee (2007Mukherjee ( ), (2008 and Mukherjee and Koyi (2009a) in sorting out trapezoidal grains from the HHSZ in other Himalayan sections.…”
Section: Studies Of Brittle and Brittle-ductile Deformationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…On larger scales as well, the thickness of the continuation of the ZSZ along the trend of the Himalaya is spatially variable (Vannay and Grasemann 2001). For example, it is 5.2-7.3 km in the Sutlej section (Mukherjee and Koyi 2009a), at least 5 km in eastern Himalaya (Carosi et al 1999), 1.5 km in the Dhaulagiri area in Nepal Himalaya (Kellet 2006;Kellet and Godin 2009), 1 km in the eastern Himalaya (Molli, Internet Reference) and especially in the Dzakaa Chu section (Cottle et al 2007), and is as low as 350-400 m in the Annapurna section (Searle and Godin 2003).…”
Section: Structures and Tectonic Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Mukherjee 2007Mukherjee , 2010aMukherjee and Koyi 2010a,b). The lower boundary of this belt is the Main Central Thrust (Jain and Anand 1988) and the upper boundary is the South Tibetan Detachment SystemUpper (STDS U ) (Mukherjee 2007(Mukherjee , 2010a; Mukherjee and Koyi 2010a). The rocks of the HHSZ could be one of the following: (i) a high-grade metamorphosed lower tectonic unit of the Lesser Himalaya; (ii) that of an upper unit of Tethyan sediments; (iii) diverse crustal elements mixed with Greater India during a major early Palaeozoic tectonism (review by Robinson et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%