Higher education learning outcomes – Ambiguity and change in higher education

Abstract

The emerging interdependent world order poses new challenges for States and citizens alike. For States, interdependence has meant a new concern with integration, whilst for citizens and authorities alike, greater mobility has raised new concerns about recognition of competences, qualifications, quality and transparency. The introduction of learning outcomes is one of the principal instruments to achieve this in higher education. This article analyses how the implementation of higher education learning outcomes (HELOs) can be seen as ambiguous governance and management tools, manifested as parts of international policy development and policy trends. These ambiguous tools intertwine with different disciplinary and stakeholder networks.The desire to implement HELOs in a more or less uniform way across as diverse contexts (countries, disciplines, institutions) as possible has led to a design strategy that favours generic definitions of learning outcomes. In the implementation process, these generic HELOs are experienced as ambiguous, meaning that they are characterised by an openness to different interpretations. This opens up a space of discretionary and interpretational latitude, either because HELOs are assimilated to traditional path dependencies, or because they allow institutional agents (such as institutional leaders and others) the space to introduce change. The ambiguity of HELOs simultaneously provides the flexibility for contextually-diverse implementation, ensures less comparability than initially envisaged, and opens up the possibility for change, although change is contingent on structures and processes that are external to the policy process itself. HELOs are thus a paradigm case of the centrality of context in policy implementation studies. K E Y W O R D Sambiguity, higher education, learning outcomes, national qualifications frameworks, policy change 8 |

Engineering Job Skills in Croatian Economy: Employers' Perspective

“…In order to encompass broader viewpoints, research on other stakeholders of engineering education (alumni, students, other engineer researchers) should be employed, for education "must be approached as a multifaceted phenomenon, which varies depending on the perspective of the key higher education actors or stakeholders who define them; employers, academics, students and academic and administrative leaders, all of whom potentially assess higher education learning outcome differently." [12].…”

“…Still, it is evident that skills and competencies have various definitions, as the perspectives of key stakeholders in academic engineering education (employers, academic institutions, students, engineering associations, and alumni) often express different positions, interests and problems [12]. This process has resulted in formulations of qualifications frameworks as conceptual backgrounds of arising European and national educational architectures oriented toward learning outcomes and skills as the main indicators of quality of education.…”

“…This process has resulted in formulations of qualifications frameworks as conceptual backgrounds of arising European and national educational architectures oriented toward learning outcomes and skills as the main indicators of quality of education. As fundamentally social and dubious in its character, the very concept of knowledge society in which education crucially affects economic development altogether with the process of developing a framework of qualifications has been widely questioned and criticised as a policy device for wider marketization of education and its adaptation to the needs of profitoriented external stakeholders, i.e., employers [12,[17][18][19][20]. However, almost none of the critics dispute neither the issue of skills and learning outcomes nor the research of employers' perspective on (engineering) education and preferable skills formation as the relevant subject.…”

Comparing Educational Policies, Programmes And Practices In Eu Institutional Governance (2011-2017)

“…Prior studies have researched how the policies, programmes and strategies would affect the professional relevance of education (Teichler, 2015) and intercultural education in Europe (Faas, Hajisoteriou & Angelides, 2013). In addition, some argue that including the educational performances in the analysis of the EU institutional governance is relevant as examining two linkages: (i) legal outcomes -social transformation (Halász, 2015); (ii) curricular approach (Soare, 2013) education outcomes -EU institutional governance (Caspersen, Frølich, & Muller, 2017). https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.08.03.94 Corresponding Author: Anca Parmena Olimid Selection and peer-review under…”

Exploring and Measuring the Key Performance Indicators in Higher Education Institutions

“…We see that the Higher education learning outcomes have attracted the interest of policy makers, agencies of quality assurance, and university administrators among others and involved university teachers in formulating the expected or required 'outcome' or result of studying programs. The higher education learning outcomes can refer to two main things: first they can identify and clarify the content of what students have studied and learnt after the course or the degree (prescribed outcomes); second, they can refer to the measurement of what students have learnt (achieved outcomes) [3]. Intended learning outcomes for higher education are four domains, which cover the expertise of understanding, intellectual skills, professional skill, general transferable skills, and practical skills [4].…”