Abstract:Studies often highlight how standardisation and consent are manufactured through the European Bologna Process (Brøgger 2019; Gibbs et al. 2014; Lawn and Grek 2012). This article shows how students’ conduct is still governed by multiple logics and dilemmas. The context for the article is the Bologna Process and the way it has been applied by the Danish government in the 2014 reforms that sought to fast-track the completion of student degrees. It analyses the impact of changes on students’ conduct through a seri… Show more
“…Students are able to resist, change and play with expectations towards them (Brooks, 2022; Tomlinson, 2017). This shows that ‘a multiplicity of logics still govern students’ choices and trajectories' (Sarauw & Madsen, 2020, p. 19) when it comes to the understanding of HE's purpose, and that the field has potentially widened and became more ambivalent instead of just replacing bildung (Tomlinson, 2017). This is also reflected in studies on the students' perceptions of quality (Jungblut et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Changing Understanding Of Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is crucial to centre the student's understandings because they can reveal if official policies and societal or political expectations of HE are reproduced, altered or resisted by students (Brooks, 2022). Previous studies have suggested that the relationship between the former and the latter is not straightforward (Nielsen, 2011;Sarauw & Madsen, 2020;Saunders, 2015). Most are national case studies or comparative studies across national higher education systems (HESs).…”
The purpose, aim and goals of higher education itself have been discussed and researched in the context of massified and marketised higher education in Germany, with a focus mainly on higher education national policies or the view of faculty staff. By shifting the perspective instead to the students, this article asks what higher education means to them nowadays. This study is based on 95 interviews with German graduate students from three disciplines (i.e. business administration/management, medicine and musicology) and it offers a typology of what students understand as the purpose of higher education. Six types were reconstructed from the empirical material, along three main lines of higher education's purpose (i.e. occupational, personal and societal). This paper also shows how the chosen discipline becomes more salient for the student's perception of higher education purpose than their social background. This questions previous research that found strong ties between instrumentalism and social background in higher education. This paper also demonstrates that social differences do matter in their egalitarian or elitist variation of understanding within non‐instrumentalist types. Overall, this study illustrates how heterogenous contemporary higher education purpose has become, which mirrors a further general differentiation in higher education.
“…Students are able to resist, change and play with expectations towards them (Brooks, 2022; Tomlinson, 2017). This shows that ‘a multiplicity of logics still govern students’ choices and trajectories' (Sarauw & Madsen, 2020, p. 19) when it comes to the understanding of HE's purpose, and that the field has potentially widened and became more ambivalent instead of just replacing bildung (Tomlinson, 2017). This is also reflected in studies on the students' perceptions of quality (Jungblut et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Changing Understanding Of Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is crucial to centre the student's understandings because they can reveal if official policies and societal or political expectations of HE are reproduced, altered or resisted by students (Brooks, 2022). Previous studies have suggested that the relationship between the former and the latter is not straightforward (Nielsen, 2011;Sarauw & Madsen, 2020;Saunders, 2015). Most are national case studies or comparative studies across national higher education systems (HESs).…”
The purpose, aim and goals of higher education itself have been discussed and researched in the context of massified and marketised higher education in Germany, with a focus mainly on higher education national policies or the view of faculty staff. By shifting the perspective instead to the students, this article asks what higher education means to them nowadays. This study is based on 95 interviews with German graduate students from three disciplines (i.e. business administration/management, medicine and musicology) and it offers a typology of what students understand as the purpose of higher education. Six types were reconstructed from the empirical material, along three main lines of higher education's purpose (i.e. occupational, personal and societal). This paper also shows how the chosen discipline becomes more salient for the student's perception of higher education purpose than their social background. This questions previous research that found strong ties between instrumentalism and social background in higher education. This paper also demonstrates that social differences do matter in their egalitarian or elitist variation of understanding within non‐instrumentalist types. Overall, this study illustrates how heterogenous contemporary higher education purpose has become, which mirrors a further general differentiation in higher education.
“…Also, the taxonomy represents a conflation of well-being and learning that may contribute to pathologizing widespread student experiences. Based on the case study, we show how the well-being agenda marks a paradigmatic turn in higher education: Whereas the current student-centred paradigm has an outer orientation towards students’ performance in relation to predefined learning outcomes (Petersen and Sarauw, 2023; Sarauw and Madsen, 2020), the well-being agenda revolves around students’ inner psychological lives, which then become the subject and the object of education. This directs the educational attention towards the cultivation of particular kinds of subjects, mindsets and attitudes rather than educational relations, knowledge forms, and academic cultures and contexts.…”
This article explores the increased concern with students’ well-being in higher education as a mode of governance that goes hand in hand with new mechanisms of exclusion. Focussing on a new student survey in Denmark that measures students’ well-being, we show how the well-being agenda is entangled with a new ‘taxonomy of attitudes and emotions’ that align with neoliberal ideals about the self-efficient and self-governing individual. Implied is a notion of learning as a smooth and effortless process, which may lead to individualization of structural challenges. With particular although not exclusive reference to the Danish case, we suggest that this new entanglement between well-being and learning represents a narrowing view on the role and purpose of higher education, which devalues the educational value of doubt, bewilderment and moments of uncertainty. Paradoxically, the well-being agenda may therefore lead to the pathologization of widespread student experiences.
“…While this comment was roundly criticised by many of those working in education for its overly narrow perspective, it is broadly representative of the assumptions that appear to underpin many HE reforms introduced across Europe over the past decade. These have included: obliging students to move more quickly through their studies so that they are able to enter the labour market sooner; encouraging employers to have a more direct input into curricula and sit on the governing boards of universities; highlighting the likely financial returns of specific degree programmes, to inform student decision-making; incentivising students to take up places on science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) courses, on the basis of ostensible employer demand; and reducing the number of places available in subject areas that are deemed not to serve well the labour market (see, for example, Degn and Sørensen 2015 ; OfS 2020 ; Sarauw and Madsen 2020 ; Walsh and Loxley 2015 ). Moreover, students have also often been positioned discursively as first-and-foremost ‘future workers’ within many European HE policy documents (Brooks 2018b , 2021 ).…”
While there is now a relatively large literature on young people's aspirations with respect to their transitions from compulsory schooling, the body of work on the aspirations of those within higher education is rather less well-developed. This article draws on data from undergraduate students in six European countries to explore their hopes for their post-university lives. It demonstrates that although aspirations for employment were discussed most frequently, noneconomic plans and desires were also important. Moreover, despite significant commonalities across the six nations, aspirations were also differentiated, to some extent at least, by national context, institutional setting and subject of study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.