2008
DOI: 10.1080/01490450802402877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Variations in Endospore Numbers within Tidal Flat Sediments Revealed by Quantification of Dipicolinic Acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, sediment texture has been shown to affect endospore abundance in aquatic sediments, with significantly lower numbers found in sandy sediments compared to black muds with higher TOC (Fichtel et al ., ); this is different to what is known for biogeochemically active microbial communities which can reach high abundances in sandy sediments (de Beer et al ., ; Musat et al ., ). Fichtel and colleagues () suggested that endospores delivered from an external source, i.e., inactive dispersing propagules, are preferentially captured in muddy sediments with small pore space and lower hydraulic conductivity. Low TOC sandy sediment at station A may, therefore, retain fewer endospores as compared to other stations consisting of muddy sediments with higher TOC (Table ) and not necessarily be reflective of the numbers of endospores carried downstream.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…However, sediment texture has been shown to affect endospore abundance in aquatic sediments, with significantly lower numbers found in sandy sediments compared to black muds with higher TOC (Fichtel et al ., ); this is different to what is known for biogeochemically active microbial communities which can reach high abundances in sandy sediments (de Beer et al ., ; Musat et al ., ). Fichtel and colleagues () suggested that endospores delivered from an external source, i.e., inactive dispersing propagules, are preferentially captured in muddy sediments with small pore space and lower hydraulic conductivity. Low TOC sandy sediment at station A may, therefore, retain fewer endospores as compared to other stations consisting of muddy sediments with higher TOC (Table ) and not necessarily be reflective of the numbers of endospores carried downstream.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…The latter explanation is supported by viable counts which show that pasteurized incubations exhibit almost the same numbers as non-pasteurized incubations (data not shown). Further, the numbers of endospores increase from about 1% of the total cell counts in Janssand surface sediments to 10% at 5 mbsf indicating an increasing number of bacteria in this resting stage with depth (Fichtel et al, 2008). At site JS-A, pasteurized and non-pasteurized incubations result in similar numbers at 0.5 and 18 mbsf as for site JS-B.…”
Section: Imprint Of Present Environmental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Based on measurements of the endospore‐specific compound dipicolinic acid (DPA) endospores are estimated to be as abundant as vegetative cells in subsurface sediments (Langerhuus et al ., ; Lomstein et al ., ; Braun et al . ; Fichtel et al ., ) and their presence is also documented by cultivation dependent enumeration (Volpi et al ., ; de Rezende et al ., ; Hubert et al ., ; Köpke et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, endospores also occur in high abundances in marine sediments, although the seabed is a homogenous and stable environment (Hoehler and Jørgensen, 2013). Based on measurements of the endospore-specific compound dipicolinic acid (DPA) endospores are estimated to be as abundant as vegetative cells in subsurface sediments Lomstein et al, 2012;Braun et al 2017;Fichtel et al, 2008) and their presence is also documented by cultivation dependent enumeration (Volpi et al, 2017;de Rezende et al, 2013;Hubert et al, 2009;Köpke et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%