2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c02191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Throughput Virtual Screening for a New Class of Antagonist Targeting LasR of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an opportunistic human pathogen, causes fatal effects in patients with cystic fibrosis and immunocompromised individuals and leads to around 1000 deaths annually. The quorum sensing mechanism of P. aeruginosa plays a major role in promoting biofilm formation and expression of virulent genes. Hence, quorum sensing inhibition is a promising novel approach to treat these bacterial infections as these organisms show a wide range of antibiotic resistance. Among the interconnected quorum sens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant π-π hydrophobic interaction with Tyr66 was also depicted stable for all sulphonamide antibacterial agents across the simulation studies. The above hydrogen bonding with Try58, Trp62, Asp75, and Ser129 was also considered significant for stabilizing a series of triphenyl-structured antagonists within the ligand binding domain of P. aeruginosa QS protein at preferentially higher binding energies than a synthetic triphenyl mimic super-inducer, TP-1 [55]. The triple aromatic-based pharmacophores of these ligands further permitted favored ligand anchoring within the binding site through face-to-face hydrophobic interactions with Tyr66, Trp63, Trp90, and/or Phe101 residues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Significant π-π hydrophobic interaction with Tyr66 was also depicted stable for all sulphonamide antibacterial agents across the simulation studies. The above hydrogen bonding with Try58, Trp62, Asp75, and Ser129 was also considered significant for stabilizing a series of triphenyl-structured antagonists within the ligand binding domain of P. aeruginosa QS protein at preferentially higher binding energies than a synthetic triphenyl mimic super-inducer, TP-1 [55]. The triple aromatic-based pharmacophores of these ligands further permitted favored ligand anchoring within the binding site through face-to-face hydrophobic interactions with Tyr66, Trp63, Trp90, and/or Phe101 residues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, residues around 80-90, 135-140, 150-165, 180-195, and 210-225 ranges were of the most flexible pattern (∆RMSF down to the highest negative values~−5.00 Å). Unlike the previously described QS proteins, the simulated CviR proteins depicted an extra stabilized residue region (45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55) near the N-terminus showing a significant immobility profile (∆RMSF~1.20 Å). Compounds 2, 11, 13, and 17 depicted high negative ∆RMSF values across the flexible regions; 180-195 and 210-225 residue range.…”
Section: Analysis Of Ligand-cvir C Violaceum Complexesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Several FDA-approved sulfonamide and carboxamide-based antimicrobial analogues predicted favorable hydrogen bond pairing with Tyr58, Trp62, Asp75, and Ser129, as well as π–π hydrophobic interaction with Tyr66 within computational studies [ 56 ]. Finally, both in vitro LasR reporter gene evaluation and in silico investigations revealed potential QscR antagonistic activity of triphenyl-structured compounds, highlighting the ligand–protein binding with Try58, Trp62, Tyr66, Trp63, Asp75, Trp90, Phe101, and/or Ser129 amino acids [ 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ligand-binding domain selection box (grid-box) was generated by locating the residues of the AHL binding domain. For each transcriptional regulator was obtained different coordinates: LasR (X: 40.491, Y: 9.8455, and Z: 7.345 Å), QscR (X: -77.418, Y: -4.841 and Z: 9.181 Å) and RhlR (X: 4.83, Y: 64.94, and Z: 40.89 Å) [37] . The interaction of each transcriptional regulator with the corresponding functional groups from the aromatic compounds was described for the bonds formed between the ligand and each regulatory protein.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%