2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-throughput SNP/CGH approaches for the analysis of genomic instability in colorectal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is likely that different tumors should vary in characteristics by several clinical aspects such as ability to metastasize and generate local recurrence. Accordingly, genomic DNA from both recurrent and non-recurrent rectal tumors in the present study showed aberrations in DNA areas that have previously been described to be frequently involved in colorectal carcinogenesis [e.g., on chromosomes 5, 8, 13, 17, 18 and 20 (11)(12)(13)(14)]. Interestingly, the copy number gains and losses were generally less pronounced in the present tumors prone to local recurrence; an observation which may not be expected in the light of numerous reports on the relationship between copy number gains and poor prognosis in colon carcinomas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it is likely that different tumors should vary in characteristics by several clinical aspects such as ability to metastasize and generate local recurrence. Accordingly, genomic DNA from both recurrent and non-recurrent rectal tumors in the present study showed aberrations in DNA areas that have previously been described to be frequently involved in colorectal carcinogenesis [e.g., on chromosomes 5, 8, 13, 17, 18 and 20 (11)(12)(13)(14)]. Interestingly, the copy number gains and losses were generally less pronounced in the present tumors prone to local recurrence; an observation which may not be expected in the light of numerous reports on the relationship between copy number gains and poor prognosis in colon carcinomas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…2, several DNA areas were significantly affected in both recurrent and nonrecurrent tumors, assessed by CGH-array analysis (p<0.05). Many of these affected regions are known to be involved in colorectal carcinogenesis, e.g., on chromosomes 5, 8, 13, 17, 18 and 20 (11)(12)(13)(14). However, DNA aberrations seemed overall more pronounced in DNA from non-recurrent tumors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human esophageal cancer cell lines (TE-1, TE-4, TE-6, TE-8, TE-9, TE-10, TE-11, TE-14, and TE-15) were obtained from the Institute of Development, Aging, and Cancer, Tohoku University (Sendai, Japan) and were cultured in a medium supplemented with 10% FBS in 5% CO 2 atmosphere at 37 C.…”
Section: Cell Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Massively parallel sequencing technology enables rapid and sensitive sequencing, thus allowing the simultaneous identification of mutations from multiple patient samples in multiple genes potentially important for tumor development (15,16). The assessment was conducted on banked tissue samples [formalin-fixed paraffinembedded (FFPE)] that were previously assessed for KRAS codons 12 and 13 from patients with mCRC enrolled in a randomized phase III study (the 408 study; ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%