2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-throughput quantum chemistry and virtual screening for lithium ion battery electrolyte additives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
98
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2009, Han et al 145 calculated the ionization potential and oxidation potential for 108 organic molecules to search for electrolytes with high oxidation voltage. For the reduction reaction, 7381 EC-based structures have been screened by Halls and Tasaki 146 in 2010. Based on the comparison of the fundamental electrochemical properties of a reductive additive required for efficient SEI formation, many descriptors can be used, such as HOMO, LUMO, electron affinity (EA), relative dipole moment, and chemical hardness (η).…”
Section: In Vivo Modification and Design Of The Seimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2009, Han et al 145 calculated the ionization potential and oxidation potential for 108 organic molecules to search for electrolytes with high oxidation voltage. For the reduction reaction, 7381 EC-based structures have been screened by Halls and Tasaki 146 in 2010. Based on the comparison of the fundamental electrochemical properties of a reductive additive required for efficient SEI formation, many descriptors can be used, such as HOMO, LUMO, electron affinity (EA), relative dipole moment, and chemical hardness (η).…”
Section: In Vivo Modification and Design Of The Seimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later on an improved model resorted to the thermodynamics instead of kinetics to evaluate the additive candidates, arguing that the electrochemical potential at which the candidate decomposes is more decisive than kinetic rate. 38,39 Since the reduction/oxidation potentials of a given species are more easily accessible via computation than kinetic data, this latter model is now widely adopted by researchers to screen and evaluate potential SEI additives. Nevertheless, those two models share the common belief that a more reactive species might be a better candidate for interphase.…”
Section: Formation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first two describe the thermodynamic ability to accept a new electron and are used to assess the reduction potential, whereas η is a measure of reaction resistance and can serve as an indicator of the kinetics. Halls and Tasaki showed that a small η and low LUMO are favorable for SEI-forming additives [35]. Another couple of properties of importance were proposed by Park: the dipole moment ( μ ), and the binding energy with a lithium cation (BE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%