2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-throughput proteomic screening identifies Chlamydia trachomatis antigens that are capable of eliciting T cell and antibody responses that provide protection against vaginal challenge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As chlamydial infection causes host cell DNA fragmentation and aberrant chromosomal segregation in dividing cells (39,(54)(55)(56), it is more likely that the contribution to carcinogenesis is based on DNA damage mechanisms rather than on MHC I subversion. The development of a C. trachomatis T cell vaccine is the current focus of many research groups (57)(58)(59). Although effective antimicrobial therapies exist, vaccination is considered to be the best approach by which to reduce the prevalence of chlamydial infections (57,60).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As chlamydial infection causes host cell DNA fragmentation and aberrant chromosomal segregation in dividing cells (39,(54)(55)(56), it is more likely that the contribution to carcinogenesis is based on DNA damage mechanisms rather than on MHC I subversion. The development of a C. trachomatis T cell vaccine is the current focus of many research groups (57)(58)(59). Although effective antimicrobial therapies exist, vaccination is considered to be the best approach by which to reduce the prevalence of chlamydial infections (57,60).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) CBA and IFN-␥ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assays. Antigen-specific IFN-␥-positive CD4 ϩ and CD8 ϩ T cells were detected and quantitated as previously described (30). Briefly, splenic CD4 ϩ and CD8 ϩ T cells, derived from immunized mice, were enriched by magnetic bead isolation, resuspended at a final concentration of 4 ϫ 10 6 /ml in RPMI 1640 medium (Mediatech, Manassas, VA) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) heat-inactivated FBS (HyClone, Logan, UT), 100 U penicillin, and 100 g streptomycin per ml, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Mediatech), and 55 M ␤-mercaptoethanol (Invitrogen Life Technologies), and plated at a density of 2 ϫ 10 5 cells per well on polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA) precoated with anti-mouse IFN-␥ capture antibody (Mabtech, Nacka Strand, Sweden).…”
Section: Cells and Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) Antigen-specific antibody titers. Antibody titers were determined by standard antigen-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) as previously described (30). Briefly, ELISA plates were coated overnight at 4C°with either 0.5 g/ml gD2⌬TMR or 1.5 g/ml ICP4 383-766 protein diluted in coating buffer.…”
Section: Cells and Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ATLAS has also been applied to the identification of C. trachomatis antigens in mice; the C. trachomatis screening library was first used to identify the specificity of a protective T cell line generated from infected mice (20) and later used to identify the entire repertoire of immunodominant CD4 ϩ and CD8 ϩ T cell antigens elicited during experimental intraperitoneal C. trachomatis infection. When separately formulated with adjuvant as protein subunit vaccines, two of the antigens identified in mice elicited antigen-specific T cells capable of conferring protection against C. trachomatis genital challenge in a mouse infection model (21). While these data were encouraging, antigen specificities and mechanisms of infection may be very disparate between inbred mice and humans; therefore, we hypothesized that the best antigen candidates would be identified through profiling the specificity and nature of T cell responses in samples from human volunteers that have spontaneously cleared natural infection with C. trachomatis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%