Phenomics in Crop Plants: Trends, Options and Limitations 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2226-2_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping Platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assume that the tractor was moving at a constant speed during the interval (200 ms) of two adjacent GPS points. The distance of the two adjacent frames within two adjacent GPS points was computed using Equation (14). Therefore, the position of each LiDAR scanned frame was able to be obtained using Equation (15).…”
Section: Data Processing Algorithm and Performance Evalutaionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assume that the tractor was moving at a constant speed during the interval (200 ms) of two adjacent GPS points. The distance of the two adjacent frames within two adjacent GPS points was computed using Equation (14). Therefore, the position of each LiDAR scanned frame was able to be obtained using Equation (15).…”
Section: Data Processing Algorithm and Performance Evalutaionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several platforms based on remote sensing technologies have been developed for automatic crop phenotyping in greenhouses over the past three decades [13,14], but such controlled conditions are significantly different in many important ways from the outdoor agricultural environment in which the vast majority of crops are produced. Admittedly, there are tremendous challenges to developing field-based high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) systems in the highly variable natural environment, including variable natural lighting, high temperature, uncontrolled rainfall, and occlusion of plant features between adjacent plants within a plot or between plots, to name a activities since it has limited capability to provide high resolution information for crops which are much smaller than trees [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual observations and manual recording of data further increase the chance of errors and therefore increase the probability of identifying false positives. Greenhouse conditions are also not ideal as they do not adequately imitate the natural field conditions [29] and offer experimental bias due to biased effects of light and temperature gradients [30]. Moisture extraction from the soil in the field is slower than in pot culture due to the limited container volume, leading to faster depletion of soil moisture in pots [31].…”
Section: Phenotyping Bottlenecksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are many high-throughput phenotyping platforms to measure plant growth and morphology [4]. These platforms can be divided into three categories depending upon the measurement environment: platforms for laboratory-, greenhouse-, or field-based measurements [5]. The Australian Plant Phenotypic Group Facility (APPF) combines digital image processing technology, large-scale computing technology and robotics, which has been successfully applied to high-throughput precision modeling and prediction of grain biomass of greenhouse plants [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%