2016
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.6b00282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Throughput Microfluidic Device for LAMP Analysis of Airborne Bacteria

Abstract: Rapid capture and detection of airborne pathogen are essential for disease prevention and public safety. In this study, we presented a microfluidic system that could capture and enrich airborne pathogens as well as performing high-throughput LAMP analysis. The system was validated by five species of bacteria and showed good stability and specificity. Detection limit down to approximately 24 cells per reaction was achieved for Staphylococcus aureus, and without the process of DNA purification. To the best of ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is a lack of microfluidic data for atmospherically relevant INPs. Further to this, although bio-aerosol sampling has been demonstrated via the use of microfluidic devices for the detection of aerosol chemical composition (Noblitt et al 2009 ; Metcalf et al 2016 ) and airborne pathogens (Jing et al 2013 , 2014 ; Ma et al 2016 ; Bian et al 2016 ; Choi et al 2017 ; Jiang et al 2016a , b ), including on-site monitoring (e.g. in hospitals) (Noblitt et al 2009 ; Jiang et al 2016c ; Liu et al 2016 ), there is a notable lack of microfluidic applications for the study of the atmospheric sciences, in particular for the measurements of atmospheric INPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a lack of microfluidic data for atmospherically relevant INPs. Further to this, although bio-aerosol sampling has been demonstrated via the use of microfluidic devices for the detection of aerosol chemical composition (Noblitt et al 2009 ; Metcalf et al 2016 ) and airborne pathogens (Jing et al 2013 , 2014 ; Ma et al 2016 ; Bian et al 2016 ; Choi et al 2017 ; Jiang et al 2016a , b ), including on-site monitoring (e.g. in hospitals) (Noblitt et al 2009 ; Jiang et al 2016c ; Liu et al 2016 ), there is a notable lack of microfluidic applications for the study of the atmospheric sciences, in particular for the measurements of atmospheric INPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…developed a MFs system that could capture and enrich airborne pathogens ( Staphylococcus aureus ) and detect them using LAMP. [ 108 ] The analysis time required from loading the bio‐aerosol to LAMP amplification was about 1.5 h with 24 cells per reaction as the detection limit for S. aureus . The specificity of the test was performed using five different air‐borne bacteria.…”
Section: Mfs For Environmental Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, these peptides were attached to underlying electrodes, and bacterial detection was measured by resulting changes in resistance with a limit of detection of 10 CFU/mL [ 70 ]. Other devices have been designed to identify pathogenic bacteria and bacteria toxins within air samples [ 71 , 72 ]. Bian et al trapped the bacteria Vibrio parahemolyticus within a microfluidic trapping device and performed mass spectrometry to identify the bioaerosols excreted by the bacteria [ 71 ].…”
Section: Disease Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bian et al trapped the bacteria Vibrio parahemolyticus within a microfluidic trapping device and performed mass spectrometry to identify the bioaerosols excreted by the bacteria [ 71 ]. Jiang et al developed a device to test air samples by flowing air spiked with bacteria through a microfluidic device coated with LAMP reagents to detect Staphylococcus aureus as well as four other common airborne bacteria with a limit of detection of 24 CFU per microfluidic channel for air spiked with S. aureus [ 72 ].…”
Section: Disease Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%