2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High throughput method for measuring urease activity in soil

Abstract: Extracellular enzymes break down soil organic matter into smaller compounds and their measurement has proved to be a powerful tool to evaluate the functionality of soils. Urease is the enzyme that degrades urea and is widely considered to be a good proxy of nitrogen (N) mineralisation. But the methods available to measure this enzyme are time consuming; as such, urease is not commonly included in standard enzyme profiling of soils. We developed a fast, high throughput and reproducible colorimetric microplate t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The available N, available P, available K, and organic matter contents were measured by the alkaline hydrolysis diffusion method, sodium bicarbonate extraction/Mo-Sb colorimetry, ammonium acetate extraction/flame photometry, and the potassium bichromate titrimetric method, respectively. Catalase activity [22], sucrase activity, proteinase activity, urease activity [23], and acid phosphatase activity [24] were measured by permanganate titration, sodium thiosulfate titration, ninhydrin colorimetry, indophenol blue colorimetry, and the disodium phosphate benzene colorimetric method, respectively [19].…”
Section: Soil Physicochemical Property Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available N, available P, available K, and organic matter contents were measured by the alkaline hydrolysis diffusion method, sodium bicarbonate extraction/Mo-Sb colorimetry, ammonium acetate extraction/flame photometry, and the potassium bichromate titrimetric method, respectively. Catalase activity [22], sucrase activity, proteinase activity, urease activity [23], and acid phosphatase activity [24] were measured by permanganate titration, sodium thiosulfate titration, ninhydrin colorimetry, indophenol blue colorimetry, and the disodium phosphate benzene colorimetric method, respectively [19].…”
Section: Soil Physicochemical Property Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase of available N was related to the urease activities, which was the only significant change in IC and IP comparing with that in MC and MP ( Table 2). The role of urease is to catalyze urea hydrolysis into ammonia and carbon dioxide [48,49], which is common in higher plants, bacteria, fungi, and algae. Thus, we speculate that the changes of soil physicochemical properties may be related to urease produced by microbial community since both the dominant genera and quantity of the microbial community were changed in IC and IP comparing with that in MC and MP ( Table 3).…”
Section: Cassava/peanut Intercropping Changed the Microbial Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil enzyme activities were measured according to the previous reports. Catalase activity [60], sucrase activity, proteinase activity, urease activity [48], and acid phosphatase activity [3] were measured by permanganate titration, sodium thiosulfate titration, ninhydrin colorimetry, indophenol blue colorimetry, and the disodium phosphate benzene colorimetric method, respectively.…”
Section: Soil Physicochemical Property Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not evaluated in this study, the use of a simple test that could be employed by farmers to determine on‐site urease activity from soils may help decide appropriate fertilizer types for a given region (Ouyang and Norton, 2020), without the need of experienced personnel or laboratory equipment to perform the analysis. Although different laboratory assays intended to quantify soil urease activity are available (Kandeler and Gerber, 1988; Sinsabaugh et al ., 2000; Cordero et al ., 2019), they require several steps with hours‐long incubations using different reagents and equipment (plate reader, centrifuge), making their implementation difficult – if not impossible – in the field. Field samples are transported, stored and analysed in a laboratory setting after days or weeks from their collection, which may result in urease activity changes derived from sample manipulation, temperature fluctuations, freeze–thaw cycles and time until its analysis (Lee et al ., 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, ammonia detection by the Berthelot reaction is commonly used to evaluate urease activity by a colour change in solution (e.g. Kandeler and Gerber, 1988; Sinsabaugh et al ., 2000; Cordero et al ., 2019), which is dramatically affected by the inherent components of environmental samples (e.g. pigments in photosynthetic biofilms preclude the reading of the assayed solutions), requiring high sample dilution, several individual steps, long incubation times and laboratory equipment, which prevent its application in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%