2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-throughput DNA isolation method for detection of Xylella fastidiosa in plant and insect samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, dissection of insects can generate cross-contamination. Thus, we tried to improve each steps of the DNA extraction protocols classically used 37 , 38 to reduce the impact of PCR inhibitors that may be contained in the insects 31 , 32 and increase yield in bacterial DNA. The complete protocol is available in Supplementary data (Appendix 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, dissection of insects can generate cross-contamination. Thus, we tried to improve each steps of the DNA extraction protocols classically used 37 , 38 to reduce the impact of PCR inhibitors that may be contained in the insects 31 , 32 and increase yield in bacterial DNA. The complete protocol is available in Supplementary data (Appendix 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If such a cohabitation is occurring in landscape trees, alternative methods must be employed to further characterize the X. fastidiosa strains within the District. A probe-based real-time PCR method for multilocus melt typing of X. fastidiosa strains in plant samples was suggested to resolve any genotypic diversity without the need for culturing (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA was extracted from each sample using a solid phase extraction protocol from Brady et al [19]. After extraction, DNA was amplified utilizing prokaryote-specific primers, 519F 5’-CAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3’) and 785R (5’-TACNVGGGTATCTAATCC-3’), that target the V4 region of the 16Ss rRNA [20,21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%