2014
DOI: 10.5599/admet.2.2.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High throughput determination log Po/w/pKa/log Do/w of drugs by combination of UHPLC and CE methods

Abstract: In 1997 Valkó et al. developed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…originally intended for screening purposes, based on the retention of compounds in a reversed-phase column under a fast gradient elution. In the present work CHI measurements were carried out via the UHPLC method as described elsewhere, using acetonitrile as the organic modifier and aqueous solutions of 50 mM ammonium acetate at the desired pH value (3.0, 7.4, and 11.0)[14]. In the case of neutral species, CHI values were converted into a log P o/w lipophilicity scale by means…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…originally intended for screening purposes, based on the retention of compounds in a reversed-phase column under a fast gradient elution. In the present work CHI measurements were carried out via the UHPLC method as described elsewhere, using acetonitrile as the organic modifier and aqueous solutions of 50 mM ammonium acetate at the desired pH value (3.0, 7.4, and 11.0)[14]. In the case of neutral species, CHI values were converted into a log P o/w lipophilicity scale by means…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty‐eight compounds with varying functional groups and size and with published values for P o/w (Table ) were used to determine the effectiveness of these nanodiscs for indirect measurement of P o/w and D pH7.0 . Retention factors ( k ) for these were measured and are reported in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and were used to calculate their log D pH10 values. To simplify the calculations, we used an approach that has been previously used by many groups , where it was assumed that log P i is 3.15 less than the log P . A value of 3.15 is a typical average difference that can vary based on ionic strength and structure of compound.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%