The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High temperature surface effects of He+ implantation in ICF fusion first wall materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…therein], LHD [31], a low-pressure Rf plasma device [17], the GLADIS device at IPP Garching [18] and also on W components in an inertial electrostatic confinement (IEC) device at the Univ. of Wisconsin [32]. Thus, He-induced W nanostructuring is seemingly device independent and is a materials issue driven by the action and accumulation of He in the elevated temperature W matrix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…therein], LHD [31], a low-pressure Rf plasma device [17], the GLADIS device at IPP Garching [18] and also on W components in an inertial electrostatic confinement (IEC) device at the Univ. of Wisconsin [32]. Thus, He-induced W nanostructuring is seemingly device independent and is a materials issue driven by the action and accumulation of He in the elevated temperature W matrix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the higher fluence of 5×10 22 3 He/m 2 at 1273 K, a coral morphology developed [38]. The coral morphology is a uniformly distributed porous and fibrous structure that was seen on tungsten samples previously irradiated in the HOMER and HELIOS devices [38][39][40][41]. The coral morphology is characteristically smaller than the porous structure that developed on sample S18.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Uw-iec Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The difficulty to reproduce the plasma environment of a laser fusion reactor (short pulses, high fluence and high energy spectral ranges of X-rays and ions) is probably the reason why those studies have been so sparse and, when they have been attempted, they did not fully reproduce the adequate conditions. From the available studies, it is pertinent to mention the repetitive thermal load investigations by the Dragon Fire laser [8], the X-ray damage simulated using Z-pinch machines [9,10] and the ion effects modeled either by RHEPP I at the Sandia National Laboratories [11] or by the inertial electrostatic confinement device at the University of Wisconsin-Madison [12]. It is important to indicate that the large number of investigations on materials and test facilities available from the magnetic fusion community cannot be directly extrapolated to laser fusion due to the intrinsically different plasma conditions [13].…”
Section: Inroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%