“…Figure 15 is the δ versus VEC map of Nb-silicide-based alloys with addition of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Sn, Ta, W. With the exception of the alloys JZ1, JZ2, JZ3 and JZ3+, all other alloys are Ti rich (Ti ≥ 24 at.%). Notice differences in the concentrations of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf and Sn in the alloys M1, M2 and M6 [ 9 , 31 , 46 ] compared with the other Ti rich alloys. The data show (i) a clear separation between Ti lean and Ti rich Nb-silicide-based alloys that are B free (this separation is different from that discussed in [ 19 ], where Ti-rich Nb-silicide-based alloys with B addition form their own separate group), (ii) that improvement in oxidation resistance (see [ 5 ] and the data in this work for JZ1 to JZ3+) goes together with the decrease and increase, respectively of the parameters VEC and δ, in agreement with NICE [ 4 ], (iii) that the addition of specific elements, e.g., Ge, Hf, Sn, Ta brings changes of the aforementioned parameters along “different routes” indicated by the arrows in Figure 15 , with Hf having a remarkable effect, particularly in synergy with Sn (iv) and that this map “pinpoints” an area that could be exploited by alloy design/development to meet property goals (see Section 6 ).…”