2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-temperature low-cycle fatigue behavior and microstructural evolution of an ODS steel based on conventional T91

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…41 As can be seen from Figure 10, in comparison with conventional non-ODS P91, the studied ODS steels as well as ODS P91 offer comparable lifetime at higher strain amplitudes (>±0.5%) and much higher lifetime under lower strain amplitudes (<±0.5%). Similar results have been also reported by others, see Ukai and Ohtsuka 9 and Straßberger et al 14,15 However, this is not surprising since stronger materials are known to offer better cyclic strain-life under lower strain amplitudes and ductile materials are acclaimed to perform better under higher strain amplitudes. 42 This is due to the fact that strong materials resist imposed strain elastically on the basis of their strength, while ductile materials resist strain plastically on the basis of their ductility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…41 As can be seen from Figure 10, in comparison with conventional non-ODS P91, the studied ODS steels as well as ODS P91 offer comparable lifetime at higher strain amplitudes (>±0.5%) and much higher lifetime under lower strain amplitudes (<±0.5%). Similar results have been also reported by others, see Ukai and Ohtsuka 9 and Straßberger et al 14,15 However, this is not surprising since stronger materials are known to offer better cyclic strain-life under lower strain amplitudes and ductile materials are acclaimed to perform better under higher strain amplitudes. 42 This is due to the fact that strong materials resist imposed strain elastically on the basis of their strength, while ductile materials resist strain plastically on the basis of their ductility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…At present, the knowledge of LCF behaviour of ODS steels is limited since only few studies were dedicated to this issue. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, these few studies successfully demonstrate the significance of oxide dispersion strengthening with respect to the cyclic properties. In comparison with the non-ODS variants, the ODS steels offer higher cyclic stress levels with significantly lower inelastic strain amplitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Compared to conventional steels, ODS steels have a better fatigue and creep resistance. As a consequence, they can be operated at higher temperatures, which would substantially reduce irradiation hardening [21][22][23]. In addition, 9Cr-ODS steels show higher uniform elongations under irradiation, which extends certain design ranges when applying codes such as RCC-MRx [17,24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In these previous studies, the damage accumulation was assumed to be linear to the number of cycles, and Miner’s rule and the formula for the linear fatigue cumulative damage was applied [ 6 ]. In order to reflect the physical process and the corresponding mechanism, researchers tried applying different parameters to measure the damage of metals after cyclic loading from different angles [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Mesmacque et al proposed that the degree of strength degradation of a material could be used to measure its damage [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%