2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00269-017-0875-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-temperature ab initio calculations on FeSi and NiSi at conditions relevant to small planetary cores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A trial fitting showed that n was statistically insignificant and therefore a density independent thermal pressure term P th = m(T T ref ) was used for the final fitting. The optimized parameters for ρ 0 , K T0 , K ′ T0 , and m were 5.67 ± 0.01 g/cm 3 , 132.30 ± 2.01 GPa, 4.53 ± 0.02, and (8.40 ± 0.03) × 10 3 , respectively, at 4,000 K, and 6.64 ± 0.01 g/cm 3 , 248.87 ± 1.45 GPa, 4.27 ± 0.01, and (8.40 ± 0.02) × 10 3 , respectively, at 300 K. Our fitting results are compared with those from previous works (Dobson et al, 2002;Ono et al, 2007;Qi et al, 2019;Sata et al, 2010;Wann et al, 2017) in Table S2 in Supporting Information S1 and Figure 1. Our EOS agrees well with recent experimental results from Yokoo et al (2023) at relatively low pressures (∼100 GPa) and 3,000 K. Static DFT calculations from Caracas and Wentzcovitch (2004) and Nagaya et al (2023) did not consider the effect of thermal pressure, thus yielding lower predicted pressure at a given density compared to this study.…”
Section: Thermal Equation Of State Of B2-fesimentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A trial fitting showed that n was statistically insignificant and therefore a density independent thermal pressure term P th = m(T T ref ) was used for the final fitting. The optimized parameters for ρ 0 , K T0 , K ′ T0 , and m were 5.67 ± 0.01 g/cm 3 , 132.30 ± 2.01 GPa, 4.53 ± 0.02, and (8.40 ± 0.03) × 10 3 , respectively, at 4,000 K, and 6.64 ± 0.01 g/cm 3 , 248.87 ± 1.45 GPa, 4.27 ± 0.01, and (8.40 ± 0.02) × 10 3 , respectively, at 300 K. Our fitting results are compared with those from previous works (Dobson et al, 2002;Ono et al, 2007;Qi et al, 2019;Sata et al, 2010;Wann et al, 2017) in Table S2 in Supporting Information S1 and Figure 1. Our EOS agrees well with recent experimental results from Yokoo et al (2023) at relatively low pressures (∼100 GPa) and 3,000 K. Static DFT calculations from Caracas and Wentzcovitch (2004) and Nagaya et al (2023) did not consider the effect of thermal pressure, thus yielding lower predicted pressure at a given density compared to this study.…”
Section: Thermal Equation Of State Of B2-fesimentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For example, the EOS and elasticity of B2-FeSi have been determined by first-principles simulations up to 160 GPa but at 0 K (Caracas & Wentzcovitch, 2004). Wann et al (2017) and Nagaya et al (2023) investigated the effect of temperature on the EOS of B2-FeSi up to 400 GPa using ab initio lattice dynamics and quasi-harmonic approximation, respectively. However, these methods do not consider the anharmonic effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, for quantum systems with optical gaps comparable to, or smaller than, the thermal energy, the ground sate is no longer a sufficient description. Accounting for thermal effects becomes essential for an accurate understanding of the electronic structure under these conditions, which often arise in novel applications based on strongly correlated materials (e.g., high-Tc superconductors and transition metal complexes at room temperature). , Other examples include, but are not limited to, chemical reactions driven by hot-electrons and those in extreme geological environments. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] Other examples include, but are not limited to, chemical reactions driven by hot-electrons [3] and those or in extreme geological environments. [4,5] Finite-temperature properties are defined as an average of all expected outcomes of an observable, weighted over an appropriate ensemble. For example, in the grandcanonical ensemble, the expectation value of an observable A at inverse temperature β = 1/k B T and chemical potential µ is defined as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation