2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High survival rate with the LMT-89 regimen in lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL), but not in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not confirm the poor outcome associated with bone marrow involvement discribed in a recent cohort of 27 patients. 26 The observation that a small subset of patients who responded slowly after induction and required a second chemotherapy course to achieve CR had better OS remains to be clarified but is in agreement with the observation by Thomas et al. that a slow response to induction chemotherapy did not have a poor prognistic significance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…We did not confirm the poor outcome associated with bone marrow involvement discribed in a recent cohort of 27 patients. 26 The observation that a small subset of patients who responded slowly after induction and required a second chemotherapy course to achieve CR had better OS remains to be clarified but is in agreement with the observation by Thomas et al. that a slow response to induction chemotherapy did not have a poor prognistic significance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…LL is rare in adult patients, the most recent prospective series dealing with 27-34 total patients (a figure comparable to our study), with only a single study from Germany including exceptionally 45 patients [8,9,19,20]. In the NILG program, induction chemotherapy was integrated with early mediastinal irradiation in patients with suboptimal tumor regression, whereas the molecular analysis of MRD was used for the first time in adult LL to decide between SCT and standard maintenance for postinduction therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies compared MRD results obtained by FC and PCR in ALL, mostly in B-lineage [44][45][46][47][48]; some of them included very few patients [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] with T-cell ALL [44][45][46][47]. In our study of T-LLy involving BM at presentation, the positive/negative concordance between the two methods using a threshold of !0.01% was 67%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to ALL, very few prognostic factors have been identified in T-LLy, such as disease stage III versus IV [11,[13][14][15] and early response to treatment, as measured by resolution of the mediastinal mass [11,16,17], and their significance is controversial, depending on the therapy delivered. Early treatment response, expressed by levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow (BM)/peripheral blood (PBL), has proven to be a powerful predictor of treatment outcome [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and was introduced to recent ALL treatment protocols for risk-group stratification [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%