High Surgical Complication Rates after Silicone Implant Use for Improvement of Glans Ridge Appearance

Abstract

Background: Construction of the glans is an important aspect of gender-affirming phalloplasty. In these surgeries, the glans ridge is commonly constructed using the Norfolk technique or a similar technique. In cases of glans ridge flattening after creation, we generally recommend a redo/revision glansplasty, which is often curative. However, in situations when the glans ridge flattens again, we developed a silicone glans implant technique in an effort to create a satisfactory and lasting glans ridge. Methods: We conducted a pilot study of our first 12 glans implant cases. A retrospective chart review and brief, ad-hoc patient survey measured patient demographics, implant status, and patient satisfaction. Results: A total of 12 patients received a silicone glans implant between November 2017 and February 2020. One patient had the glans implant removed before the survey, and also could not be contacted. Three patients did not respond to the survey. Of the eight patients who responded, only five (5/8, 63%) patients still had the silicone implant at the time of the survey. The average satisfaction score was 3.25 (range 1 = very satisfied and 5 = very dissatisfied). Common complaints cited included dissatisfaction with implant appearance, as well as infection, discomfort, and pain. Conclusions: Patients and surgeons should be aware of the possibility of a novel silicone implant technique to create a glansplasty in those with failed/flattened previous glansplasty surgery. However, the technique is in development: patient satisfaction remains spotty and complication rates are high, although technical improvements may increase future success rates.